Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Now that North Korea has gone nuclear, should America nuke first? as a preemptive strike?
What would be the consequences of NK nuking any city outside its territory? Should the world let that happen?
8 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
North Korea does not have the capability of launching a long range nuclear weapon. As per information available it has enough material to make 8 small bombs. It doesn't have a long range missile that can take the weapon any where near America.
It cannot contemplate on striking first because it depends on external aid even to feed its people. The people of NK should be educated on this development and they should take steps to restrain any such ideas of their government.
There are going to be sanctions...the people will get affected.
Most importantly US should not do the policeman's job and allow UN to take the lead and perform the role it is designated to perform. UN should be authorised by the world to take decisions aand action.
- SummerRain GirlLv 61 decade ago
If NK does anything like that involving Weapons of Mass destruction they will see there lasts days on earth. I have a feeling that war VS NK will be approaching fast. I do see NK getting one or two nukes off probably targeted at SK but we never know. I just hope that if NK fires or drops one Nuke at anyone that the U.S or some other Nation
Drops like 5-20 on NK. I know there are good people in NK but good people or not its a fight for survival once nukes come into play.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
One out of three, does not mean "gone nuclear" , Science is for everyone not just Terrorist countries. Enriched uranium is a product of the 21st century. It should not be used by the criminally insane, or countries that promote, or use terrorism as a catch all for their short comings. I feel that those countries that have broken the Nuke Trade Agreement should have their use of nuclear enrichment removed until they can prove beyond a shadow of doubt what they are enriching it for. Weapon Inspectors can find violators, if all is fair and equal no one could build a nuclear warhead with out inspectors knowledge. If all were fair, there would be no need either!
Source(s): ne--phx18 - acid tongueLv 71 decade ago
You better think twice before you start your preemptive strike, north korea has whole cities deep underground, and theUS has not the foggiest idea where they are, north korea is not a gag tag army like Iraq, we could not whip them 50 years ago, what makes you think you can do so now
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 decade ago
no we should give japan nukes and let them do it... they have been itching to do it for a long time... then we should kill clinton and carter for giving them the capability
- Anonymous1 decade ago
China would be the consequence.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
its like if johnny brings a knife to school but suzy has a knife too...when johnny finds out suzy has a knife he gets scared and says...I dont want her to do anything bad to me w/ her knife.. so...you can see where this story is going...now the us and n korea arent kids in a schoolyard...but jeeze...arent they acting like them?..