Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

snashraf asked in News & EventsCurrent Events · 1 decade ago

The term 'war against terrorism' should be 'war for peace'.What is your opinion please?

13 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    anytime there is war against anything it just makes more war so i agree it should be war for peace im not against anything im for good and happiness and for the war for peace

    Source(s): support our troops no matter what your opinion is
  • 1 decade ago

    I would fight in a war against terrorism. War for peace doesn't make sense to me.

  • 1 decade ago

    The correct terminology is War against Islamo Fascists Nazis.

    I Cr 13;8a

    11-27-6

  • 1 decade ago

    Neither make sense. War against terrorism is like a War against poverty, you just CAN'T prevent either 100%. Now a war for peace makes no sense because peace =/= war so it's just...wrong.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It's called 'war against terrorism' because we are fighting Islamic fascists bent upon killing as many civilians as they can, until we stampede off the cliff. Islamic fascists are also called terrorists.

    In the process of eradicating terrorists, we shall have peace.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    war against terrorism

  • 5 years ago

    The abomination in Iraq might want to of not in any respect occurred, yet Afghanistan in justified. despite the indisputable fact that, my opinion on terrorism is that it's not defeated and is used through radical 0.33 international international places as a protection from those that infringe on their lives. maximum radical terrorists from the middle East, Afghanistan, etc will sacrifice 1000's of suicide bombers purely to kill ten individuals. you won't be able to in any respect defeat those who worship death over existence. So, see you later as we save as presence of their lives, the terrorists will proceed to discover approaches to attack. So, the conflict on Terror is yet otherwise of putting forward throwing sturdy funds away after undesirable. decrease back to Afghanistan: we would want to be out of there through now. ignore about spreading Democracy through planting an American sponsored puppet in means. The Russians went broke battling those human beings for ten years, do we truly imagine they're going to fold adversarial to us? we've a tendency to ignore historic previous plenty. Afghanistan change into Russia's Vietnam in that they confronted a foe that would sacrifice 10000 adult males purely to kill ten of them. We confronted that in Vietnam and now we are repeating it back in Afghanistan.

  • 1 decade ago

    it should. You'll be surprised to know that the first idea for Operation Iraqi Freedom was actully Op. Freedom Iraq but they changed it because with the initials you can make Op. Fuel Iraq.

  • Em E
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    We are embroiled in a war against people who want to annihilate us because we do not follow Islamic precepts.

    Annihilate us = Kill us.

  • 1 decade ago

    A. That's an oxymoron

    B. That would remove the element of fear in the American people, and that's the whole point.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.