Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why don't we ever see televised executions?
Saddam was just executed and all that was there was a grainy film from an onlooker that got 30 seconds of it. Why did Iraqi officials not let the execution be televised? They did not execute 2 others that were supposed to be executed with Saddam because they said they wanted Saddam's execution to be "special". If they had 30 days to execute him and did it so quickly, and were happy about it, then why not let the world see that it really happened? This is how all of the stupid conspiracy theories get started....Was it really him?
8 Answers
- c_ray_mcmanusLv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
Too many human rights groups. They would never allow it. I for one would have enjoyed watching the execution of Saddam. I believe that if the U.S. would have made the Saddam execution a Pay Per View event, it would have raked in more than enough money to pay for the rebuilding fo Iraq.
- ?Lv 61 decade ago
Allowing the public to view executions, or later on, to allow the publication of photographs of the executed were once common--at least in the USA. It used to be quite the rage, don't you know!
For the most part nowadays such things are decided upon by the public morality judges-- at least in the USA-- whether to let the public see the corpse of a celebrity (or anyone) who was killed or executed. Times have changed. Can you imagine what it would be like had newspapers continued to publish, and perhaps later TV to broadcast, images of people's corpses in order to 'prove' they were dead? Would you like to see such photographs included in the obiturary section of your local newspaper?
It's a moral issue!
"What we have here is... failure to communicate! "
(Cool Hand Luke)
Also, you might want to read:
http://www.answers.com/topic/media-ethics
Hope this helps!
- my_iq_135Lv 51 decade ago
Because most Americans would vote to end the death penalty if they actually saw a person murdered by the government. The first time one is televised would be the end of government murder. By keeping it off TV, and private, government sanitizes killing prisoners.
Anyone that has been a part of an execution will not ever want to do it again (if they have any sanity to them.)
You forgot to ask. Was he really murdered? We will never know what they did. Will we?
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Please... after CBS was sued for half a second of a naked breast during the Super Bowl, you think the Networks would show an execution on a continuous loop? Not even Bill Gates could afford the FCC fine that would follow.
Besides, that why god created PPV. (Or Allah created Al Jazeera.)
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 decade ago
1st. they dont show televised executions beacause some children accutally watch the news with their parents. And its "not good" for children to watch that.
2nd you can search the internet on your own time to watch a longer clip of him getting executed
- 1 decade ago
Because too many people think its too violent, etc, etc......But hell, the government could have made a mint with Pay Per View....$49.95 a pop to watch him hang........So many people out there with that morbid curiosity........
- 1 decade ago
well the united states channel did not allow us to see the exucution because they thought it was to violent for yuong viewers and people in households. some parts they had to edit !!
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Actually, those closest to the case would have more reason to watch and bear wittiness I did not need to see this.