Do you believe the us government set up 9/11 ?

yes i do ii think bush had somthing to do with it tooo

in all probability you're incorrect. United countries did no longer set any cut-off date for Iran to submit a respond for the suggestion presented through five+a million powers. 8/22 is the date set through Iran voluntarily. however the UN set a cut-off date which asks Iran to droop its nuclear enrichment through 8/31. we can not see any links or maths relationship with 9/11 and eight/22. If US intends to attack Iran on 9/11, there will be a grave retaliation through Iran the place ninety% of Israel would be wiped off and US bases interior the Gulf. hundreds of hundreds individuals troops stationed in Iraq ought to stand dying effects except they go away the area. there's no assure for the effectual US conflict against Iran despite if nukes. In different hand, Irans Nuclear activities will bypass underground and that they'll receive rankings of Nuclear Bombs as speedy as unpredicted. finally there will be no roll for the U. S. interior the middle east, Asia and Africa. Even there will be no US potential or US proud. US will grow to be a Rogue great potential and the international community will hate it. *** Salute the "HiTLer, tHe brave RuLeR"

I believe the Saudis, and Syrians set up 9/11

No.

Loosechange is a fictional movie which uses unsubstantiated and cherry picked "facts" and bogus assertions along with innuendo and rumors to promote this ridiculous theory.

Three rewrites and one cut version later with the "final cut" coming out in March, 2007 - does this sound like the makings of a documentary?

No, and I hate Bush, but it was sheer idiocy that caused 9/11. Bush vowed to take everything that Clinton was working on and burn it. That is the reason that the reports were neglected.

I would also like to point out that M. Albright was working on a deal with N. Korea to help them setup a Nuclear Power Plant. When Bush blew off Kim Jong IL, Kim decided to do his own nuking.

I am not saying I like Clinton, but blowing off everything he was doing was total idiocy...9/11 took intelligence.

Horsepucky.

i think the clintons backed the terrorists with the proceeds from whitewater

NO!

Just say "NO!" to unfounded conspiracy theories!!!

No

Those internet films are neat, but the theory that 911 was planed as pretext for Iraq war is far fetched idea and highly superficial. If 911 truely was planed by US gov so it can be used as execuse to attack Iraq why didn't they plant/invent more evidences linking Saddam directly to 911. But instead they went to war on WMD case that was very weak and openly criticized by government insiders. It doesn't make sense that they planed something that big and made it almost meaningless for Iraq War case by forgetting to directly link Saddam to it. WMD campaign took tremendous effort by the Bush administration and we even went to war without UN security council clearance. So they were willing to risk going to unjust war when they could have simply added fake evidence that Saddam had direct link to 911? If they did that they would have saved world of trouble making WMD case.

Also there were many intelligence leaks regarding WMD campaign by the Bush administration and many insiders came forward to criticize the way it was pushed forward. But not a single leak or gov insider came forward about so called '911 inside job.' That's pretty hard to believe. Something that huge, something that involves obviously more people than were involved in Iraq WMD case some how produced no leaks? No dissidents? Too good to be true? And it probably is.

Here's some example how they twist facts to create dramatic 911 stories.

Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’

You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader. This article is used to claim that hijackers are made up/fake people in this ‘conspiracy.’ Yes, it’s sad. They took an article about mistaken identities and turned it into 911 ‘mystery.’

Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages. Usually demolition takes almost month of gutting and preparation for much smaller buildings. Twin towers were not taken down with bombs as claim by some. http://www.debunking911.com/

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/v... Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary. Lot of stories about gov shooting down flight 93, missile theories...etc seem to have originated from this.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? Some cars were damaged too by the plane grazing over highways.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg...

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0...

Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways and have taken military actions without UN clearance in the past. If we can go to war whenever we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?

Why would so many authorities make bold claims that reveal this so called 'inside job' if it is inside job? As 911 theory people claim. Did Nixon ever go on TV and say 'oh yea I bugged those suckers' before whole thing became public? Lot of 911 theory claims don't make sense. If you have secret plot to bring down buildings and disguise it as terrorism would you tell people about it on TV interviews or in public?

I think 911 inside job theory is highly superficial and perverted form of pleasure for people who are easily persuaded.