Lets try this one more time?

America is not better under President Bush although terrorism was checked. Should there be evidence, an impeachment is proper in order to know whether President Bush violated the constitution.

You may not be flaming. When I was younger that term meant something entirely different than On Fire.

Now the Answer: First I will make this statement. "You are a Liberal, even if you don't except the label." The reason is real clear with your questions and the term King Bush. He is your president if you reside in this country. Your President deserves your respect. You definitely have been blinded by the liberal left as to what occurred.

Just keep your eyes closet to the truth. One of these days soon, you liberals will find the enemy standing in your back yard. God help you then.

Hisemiester

I am no fan of Bush but I presume you are not surprised by the reaction you got given the slanted nature of your questions. Now to the questions. Am I better off now than I was before Bush? Yes...in spite of him. Is America better off under his direction? Yes...there hasn't been so much soul-searching on the part of the American public about critical issues like 'what does the Constitution stand for?' and 'what does it mean to be American?' since the late 60s, if not since the Great Depression, and I feel, even though I wish there was a better context to consider these things in, that it is a good thing that we think and speak about these things...far better than talking about who's gonna be the next American Idol. And to your last question...governments, historically, have never been fantastically truthful. For thousands of years leaders and politicians have lied to citizens, subjects, and each other as a matter of statecraft and it's not clear why this particular aspect should change. Espionage and counter-spying, etc., is a necessary security strategy. What is disturbing here is not that Bush decieved the world community, he has no obligation to be truthful with them, or that he decieved us, we've never had 'full-knowledge' anyway, but that he seems to have thoroughly decieved himself and thereby lost touch with reality.

Yawn... is that all you got? To answer your questions in re: to our good President, We are definitely safer under the direction of Pres Bush... If you'll refer back to when Clinton was Pres, he did absolutely nothing for America, when the terrorists attacked starting in 1993 on the WTC to the American Embassy in Africa, and then a few others that followed..

And... let me see, if you did your homework, you would know that there were in FACT weapons found, not all, as they were moved into a neighboring Country in which we arent allowed. And NO, because he didnt LIE abt anything.

No

It is because the President is fighting to save your way of life. In many countries around the world you would not have been able to post such a letter on line.

To write down the President has lied would be enough for you to see a dark room for many years, if not sued for liable or slander

If the others win you will be either dead or in prison facing Mecca 5 times a day

Answers:

1. Yes. The alternative would have been Al Gore and we would be in much more serious trouble now if we had him on 9/11 as president.

2.Yes ***see above***

3.No. The intel was bad.

Fred says he will run and Im voting for him! This is my answer to your three questions! NO, NO,And Hell Yes!

The way you word your question is why you get slammed.

Try not making a joke of it, you will get real answers.