Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
How can White House or Capital Hill makes decisions for the ones who lead our troops in the front?
Do you agree that the generals on the field are best fit to make the critical decisions?
6 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
absolutely without doubt! Bush or any President shouldn't be allowed to be commander in chief. Leave it up to the Generals and not just one General.....a panel of Generals... who's decisions should be finalized by the vote of the people! Amen.
- koalatcomicsLv 71 decade ago
the problem is liberals will never let it go...too much of the feel good, kumbayah, id like to buy the world a coke type philosophy. if they wouldve let the army fight in nam instead of washington, wed never have lost it. look at cut and run. its a disgusting display of cowardice, but another example of how liberals wont leave well enough alone. the generals should make the decisions, however hillary has already made her intent public to change the constitutional structure of the commander in cheif by putting congressional limitations in place that should never be there and you know the pelosi/reid regieme cant be far behind.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Congress authorizes, which means they can unauthorize at any time. Bush can veto - but no more $$$. Generals run it on money and with the direction of the Pres. In short - the congress and the executive must agree. Generals follow the agreement.
- 1 decade ago
the government should give the military the mission and goals. But the generals should be left alone to get that job done. This war would probably be over alot sooner if the military could just do it's job.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
first question: we elect them to power. Since they are elected by us, they have legitimate power to do such.
second question: Yes, but at the same time, it can not always be entirely them. There are sometimes political aspects in a certain military decision that needs to be weighed also
- Anonymous1 decade ago
yes,, but Bush will fire them if they don't agree with his doctrine,,,the only critical decisions that Bush will listen to are those that fit his way of thinking,,, right or wrong,,, Bush only wants the people to succumb,, yer either with us or your against us and you will die,,,,