Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What if WWE was small like TNA?

Let says that WWE was around only 5 years like TNA. WWE have no big superstars and have no Wrestlemania. All the big superstars was in TNA now and WWE have less know wrestlers.

WWE show was only for an hour and TNA show was on 2 hours. WWE pay-per-view was on for 3 hours and TNA pay-per-view was on for 4 hours.

TNA has the best storyline and WWE has an ok stroyline. TNA have a better website than WWE website.

Would WWE fans stay and watch WWE with less know wrestlers or would they watch the big superstar on TNA.

There is No Mr. MaMahon at WWE or anyelse.

WWE has one video game and TNA has a lot of video games.

TNA was on a better TV channel than WWE.

12 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Well I would watch TNA in this case because I like to watch wrestlers who can wrestle. But if TNA had big name superstars who can't wrestle, like Batista, and the WWE still had their mid-card great superstars like Jeff Hardy and Chris Benoit, then I would still watch the WWE. If TNA was on a regular cable channel (1-20 is all I have) then I might watch it, but the WWE is what I usually watch because I get all of the shows for free online on a website. But overall, if I could, I'd probably try to watch both shows.

  • 1 decade ago

    The truth is this is impossible for even an hypothetical situation. As long as Vince runs WWE then it will be on top. He is the one that made it what it is and it will die with him too. His children don't have the ability to run the company like he has. If you take everything that built WWE like Vince Wrestlemania, the wrestlers, then I am sure another program would come and replace it. Those thing are WWE.

    So basicall what I guess you are asking is that if this was opposite day and everything that is true all of a sudden became not true then would TNA be better then WWE. And the answer then is true.

  • 1 decade ago

    If that happened, steroid abusing faggots who can't wrestle (John Cena, Batista), wouldn't be paid 1,000,000$ a year to suck. Instead, maybe they'd have decent wrestlers. I still think TNA Is the better industry, not in sales, but in talent. I actually wouldn't mind WWE if they would just stop shoving retards like Cena down our throats.

    Anyways, I think TNA would handle the success better.

  • 1 decade ago

    Vinnie Mac would make the fatal mistake of hiring Vince Russo again and the the WWE would get run into the ground faster than WCW.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    WWE would prob have to improve their product in order to do so, when TNA gets a 2hr weekly show eventually and gets bigger, trust me the matches will get worse and everything!!!!

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    TNA isn't the 1st employer to apply a hoop extra effective than 4 factors. jewelry like that have been utilized in Mexico for years. it works for cruiserweights and severe flyers, yet no longer plenty heavyweights

  • 1 decade ago

    I'd watch WWE because the six-sided ring is weird.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    well everyone would watch TNA but they will never be as succsesful as wwe.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    i would quit watchn wwe but that wont happen

    Source(s): --O-- -_^_-
  • 1 decade ago

    that would suck....

    Good it aint Happening!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.