Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Radioactive clean up?

If a radio active material is radioactive because it decays at a constant rate, couls another material accept the radioactive particles given off. I suppose what i mean is could there be a material which behaves opposite to radioactive material(is this dark matter) which could be used to clean up a radioactive incident.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Here is some basic info on shielding radioactive materials.

    The manner in which a material (such as lead) stops radiation depends, among other things, on the type of radiation. We will consider four types of radiation in our answer: gamma rays and x rays, alpha particles, beta particles, and neutrons.

    Gamma rays and x rays are electromagnetic radiation of a higher energy than visible light or ultra violet.

    Alpha particles are helium nuclei and possess a positive charge.

    Beta particles are electrons and as such possess a negative charge.

    Neutrons are particles that have no net charge.

    The energy of the radiation also plays a role. In general, the higher the energy of the radiation, the harder it is to stop. This issue will not be considered further because it is a particularly complex subject.

    For most types of radiation, increasing the density of the material reduces the intensity of the radiation getting through. However, a low-density material can provide just as much shielding as a high-density material if it is thicker. In other words both the density and the thickness are important.

    For gamma rays and x rays, lead is a particularly effective shield because lead has a high atomic number (Z) of 82. The atomic number is the number of protons in an atom. Since the number of protons per atom of lead is large, the number of electrons is also large, and it is the electrons that stop gamma rays and x rays. Sooooo, density, thickness, and atomic number can all be importan.

    Shielding reduces the intensity of gamma rays and x rays in an exponential manner (more or less). In other words, a shield reduces the intensity of the radiation getting through, but it might never stop all the gamma rays (at least theoretically). What I am saying is that the phrase "complete protection" in the question might be better changed to "almost complete protection" because some gammas have the potential to get through any shield (in theory). I recognize I am splitting hairs here.

    Denser materials might be more effective at stopping alphas and betas when the material is very thin, but this is usually a nonissue because even one centimeter of plastic will stop all but the very highest energy beta particles and almost anything, even a piece of paper, can stop alpha particles. Lead is sometimes a problem if it is used to stop beta particles because high-atomic-number materials generate secondary radiation called bremsstrahlung (essentially the same as x rays) when exposed to beta particles--something low-atomic-number materials will not do. As such, plastic can be a more effective beta (electron) shield than lead. In fact, an x-ray tube produces x rays (primarily bremsstrahlung) by bombarding a high-atomic-number target, such as tungsten, with electrons. The electrons are stopped but the target becomes a source of radiation.

    As a rule, lead is almost useless for stopping neutrons. For neutrons you normally want a low-atomic-number material such as hydrogen, etc. The key is that the material have a high probability (cross section) for interacting with neutrons. Hydrogen is good here. Unfortunately, in the process of stopping the neutrons, the neutron shield can become a source of gamma rays. Therefore, neutron shields often incorporate a high-atomic-number material like lead to stop the gamma rays that are produced when the neutrons are stopped.

  • 1 decade ago

    For lack of a better term, "normal" material can be used to absorb radiation from a material that emits radiation.

    Now, it seems like you're asking about a potential "anti-radioactive" materal. Am I right? Something that could be added to, say, uranium, that would instantly stabilize it?

    I've never heard of such a material (though, I'm not as deep into modern physics as I am into chemistry and engineering). I suppose taking the stuff to absolute zero temperature (a purely theoretical state) would stop all motion, including particle emission and radiation.

    In the scope of radioactive waste remediation, the coolest thing I've ever heard is findings of microorganisms found in the soil of radioactive disaster sites. Supposedly, they've adapted sufficiently, and can eat radioactive waste for lunch! Might be interesting...

  • 5 years ago

    Nest

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I believe that there is but to clean it up would create an explosion or a catastrophi event because dark matter (anti matter) and matter mix it cancels out creating a lot of energy.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.