Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why when they announce a State Execution they say Inmate was given a injection with a sterile syringe?
Does it really make a differance
12 Answers
- Susan SLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
One more absurdity about the system. The cost of the death penalty has very little to do with the actual execution. Some of the answers you got have mistakes. Here are answers, with sources listed below, to questions often asked about the death penalty.
Isn't the death penalty cheaper than keeping criminals in prison?
The death penalty costs much more than life in prison. The huge extra costs mount up even before the trial. They are due to the complicated nature of both the pre trial investigation and of the trials (involving 2 separate stages, mandated by the Supreme Court) in death penalty cases.
What about the risk of executing innocent people?
Over 120 people on death rows have been released with evidence of their innocence, many having already served over 2 decades on death row.
Doesn't DNA keep new cases like these from happening?
DNA is available in less than 10% of all homicides. It is not a guarantee against the execution of innocent people.
Doesn't the death penalty prevent others from committing murder?
No reputable study shows the death penalty to be a deterrent. Homicide rates are higher in states that have it than in states that do not. Most killers don't think about the consequences anyway. They do not think they will be caught (if they think at all.)
So, what are the alternatives?
Life without parole is now on the books in 48 states. It means what it says. Supermax prisons are terrible places to spend the rest of your life. Life without parole is less expensive than the death penalty.
What about the very worst crimes?
The death penalty isn’t reserved for the “worst of the worst,” but rather for defendants with the worst lawyers. When is the last time a wealthy person was sentenced to death, let alone executed??
Doesn't the death penalty help families of murder victims?
Not necessarily. Murder victim family members across the country argue that the drawn-out death penalty process is painful for them and that life without parole is an appropriate alternative.
So, why don't we speed up the process?
Many of the 123 innocent people released from death row had already been there for over 2 decades. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent person.
But don’t Americans prefer the death penalty as the most serious punishment?
Not any more. People are rethinking their views, given the facts and the records on innocent people sentenced to death. According to a Gallup Poll, in 2006, 47% of all Americans prefer capital punishment while 48% prefer life without parole.
Many people have supported the death penalty because they have not yet found out about the practical problems with it. But we are learning.
Source(s): Death Penalty Information Center, www.deathpenaltyinfo.org, for stats on executions and states where they occurred, poll results, reports on costs, and links to testimony (at state legislatures) of victims' family members. http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/offenses/standard_li... the FBI Uniform Crime Report for 2005. (As of now, only preliminary stats are available for 2006) Stats found here can be compared to stats on the number of executions in different states. The Innocence Project, www.innocenceproject.org - 1 decade ago
They believe that such pleasentries will give a small amount of dignity and respect to the act of taking someones life. In the end it is said that it is due to the fact that a decision could come at any time to stop the execution, so there is no point in doing any more harm than necessary. I beleave it is just so it is slightly more humanistic, if that's possible.
- Beach SaintLv 71 decade ago
I hate capital punishment. While I detest criminals of any kind and sometimes say, "I'd wish he'd die," when the news comes on saying so-and-so was just executed, a part of ME dies.
I guess I just don't believe in an eye for an eye. So, it doesn't matter what the technique. I understand you were trying to make a sarcastically funny statement. I think any form is a bizarre way of going about criminal justice and maintaining our humanity.
- 4 years ago
i don't bear in mind ever having alcohol swab while having an injection yet admittedly i don't have them oftentimes i'm particular they do nevertheless. i don't understand why kamikaze pilots placed on helmets and individuals on indexed decrease than are continuously reporting the solid question and not the troll ones. probably because of the fact they themselves have not have been given the brains to ask solid ones themselves so motel to getting each and all of the solid ones bumped off.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
They are a bunch of idiots, it doesn't make any difference at all, the person is dead before any infection can set in.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Not really. But I still don't understand why they phased out the gas chamber -quick, painless, and cheap.
- Amy WLv 61 decade ago
no, it doesn't make a difference, but you never know what group of wackos like the ACLU will make a fuss if they use a dirty needle that could theoretically give him AIDS if he did live which he won't anyway.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Wouldn't want to be liable for a Dead Guy, being infected......It's a sad commentary on our country ( Sigh )
- 1 decade ago
Yes, it matters. It would be cruel to use a dirty needle. We are still talking about a person and you wouldn't want the executioner to be exposed to germs either.