Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

matahari asked in Education & ReferenceTeaching · 1 decade ago

Piaget vs Vygotsky / behaviourist vs constructive?

Hi guys, does anyone knows who support the idea of rewards in class, Piaget vs Vygotsky? Are they on behaviourist vs constructive?

Thank you.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Albert Bandura (behaviourist) (bobo doll studies):

    Children learn about social behaviour by:

    • Watching other people – (observational learning)

    • Imitating other people

    • Doing something they take pleasure in (intrinsic reinforcement). This will cause them to repeat an activity behaviour.

    Banduras key ideas:

    • Children model themselves on adults that are present in their lives

    • Children’s thought processes are affected by their age

    Burrhus Skinner (behaviourist) (operant conditioning):

    Skinner experimented on rats and pigeons. He used his concepts of positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement to shape the animals behaviour. For example, he fed them if they did as he required. However he punished them with an electric shock if they went near an area of the cage he did not want them to.

    • Skinner believed children respond similarly to adults who show them positive and negative reinforcement towards certain aspect of their behaviour. With positive reinforcement they will be encouraged to repeat an reinforcement they will be encouraged to repeat an experience thus developing their learning. Skinner felt children’s learning is related to their responses to external stimuli.

    • He believed children learn from their experiences and that they only repeat the experiences that are enjoyable.

    Ivan Pavlov (behaviourist) (classical conditioning):

    Pavlov experimented on salivating dogs. He produced a ‘conditional stimulus’ which was the sound of a church bell ringing at the same time as producing an un-conditioned stimulus (food) in front of the dog.

    Eventually the dog would produce saliva (an in-conditioned response) whenever it heard the sound of the church bells ringing because it associated it with food.

    Pavlov related this experiment to children’s behaviour and believed he could control it by producing a condition response.

    An example may be a school bell that signals to children that it is play time.

    The Behaviourists named above definately support the use of rewards systems. Neither Piaget or Vygotsky were behaviourists.

    Source(s): I am a lecturer in childcare.
  • 1 decade ago

    You must be an education major.

    The most popular behaviorist was Skinner. Piaget and Vygotsky were both Constructivists.

    Vygotsky would support the idea of rewards in the classroom because he believed that you learn from social interactions.

    Piaget believed that you learn from your enviornment and then construct your own meaning.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Vygotsky And Piaget

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    This is actually a ridiculous question.... For anyone to say Bruce would lose a fight to anyone proves how uneducated they are about the man. Anyone who could even think for a second about Brock getting one shot at Bruce Lee makes me wonder if they have ever even experience Bruce Lee in the first place. I'm not even bias I LOVE Brock Lesnar the man is a machine but the fact that Bruce Lee even lived is a marvel... he was magic. The stuff he did just isn't explained... small or not... cage or no cage... Bruce would have demolished him. In the cage if Brock ever did get close to him... Bruce would hit brock LITERALLY 15 times before Brock could complete won giant swing... and not little fast hits either... the thing is, Bruce had just as much power as well in those fast strikes. They talk about Ali's speed but Lee was 100 times faster than Ali. Plus he was as powerful as any heavyweight. To even add Mike Tyson in this question is nonsense. Not too say he wasn't good... but Ali was 50 times better than Tyson and Bruce was 1000 times better than that. Brock would beat Tyson.... Muhammad Ali would beat both... Bruce Lee would beat anybody in history...

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.