Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Can you think of Non-violent HERO Gandhi - A Creation of Britishers to rule India and get away unhurt..?

I always feel british world politics are manulaptive and all thier acts and policies are made with the purpose so that they can have hold of what all they want to do.. They can make a Zero to Hero to anyone to gain and achieve what they want to achive..

Can you put think Gandhi as Non-viloance HERO could have been Zero.. I feel Britishers wanted to leave India unhurt and create a situtation by creating particition with hatred that even after they leave thier porpose of ruling country from outside can be fulfilled..

Freedom movement of Subhash, Bhagat Singh and Savarkar would have made them to pay a lot and would have left the United India today.. But all those are snubbed as part of thier word poltics..That is why all are made as part of bad history by them and people who are mentally slave even today..

Update:

Please dont get me wrong that i am trying to take away credit of freedom fighter or Gandhi.. Just a thought on British Policy than and even today how they want to get hold of all around by all means.. How they implemented devide n rule policy that even after 50 years seed of hatred has resulted into major peace block resulting into the arm race and arm business !!

7 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    First of all, Gandhi used passive resistance, an effective tool, based on principles enshrined in the teaching of Jesus Christ, so it was very difficult for the British to retaliate.

    Secondly, the Brits had a tremendous sense of fair play - something that's sorely lacking in so-called independent india where corruption, caste violence, and nepotism is the order of the day. True, An Indian Governor-General would have had Gandhi 'killed' in an encounter, and planted evidence against him. End of story.

    Thirdly - the Queen of England today is a figure-head. She doesn't take any decisions.

  • kbn_25
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    You know voilent movements need the finance to procure personnel & materials, which was not available with the freedom fighters (voilent & non voilent) in the ratio what Britishers had at that time. Even if the voilent movement only would have been adopted and victory achieved (which was in dark), it could have come with greater losses (may recall battel of Mahabharat, Ram-Ravan, Word war -I & II, Vietnam, Phelisten-Eseryle and even to days Naxeles, Terrorists, Reservation / Land / Water desputes etc. what gainings have been achieved fromthese & how much losses ocurred).

    In non voilent movements only time & sometime personnel (few due to cruelity in governance) are the losses and gaining is always higher.

    Source(s): Self.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The think and not think is not a factor.

    Factor is many of them give their own contribution for freedom movement. The way of each individual is different of there own thoughts and the underlying factors, and in some aspect every one have positive and negative. If your direction is to point out the negative , may other one will replace with the positive. The other one come with positive may you have take as negative as per your vision and may its your wrong programed mental strategy and condition depends.

    Hence not take the negative aspects of the individual, its may vary as per the circumstances and the genetic week factors of . Accept the nature of understanding and awareness and this good grace with uplift the living world with your capacities, if not willing not distrub.

    Let the river to flow and watch the river both side greenish smiling to the sun , and its gratitude to ...... its the simplicity story of nature.

  • 1 decade ago

    The British improved the lives of people in every country they went to. It is a shame that they get demonized, when they should be celebrated for helping to civilize the world. Despite popular opinion, colonialism was a good thing.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    y'know...that guy krishna just about sums it up...i won't repeat.

    so have some respect...for yourself...and get some education.

    remember...ignorance is no excuse :)

    as for the britishers...they were just a bunch of manipulative wimps with a god complex...gandhi made sure they gave it up...for sure...look at them now..B-grade lowly island of a country of europe..

  • ?
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    to behonest i dont think britan is too political because the queen makes all the final decisions.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Gandhi hated Blacks and dark Indians.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.