Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

If fire is the rapid oxidation of a substance, does that mean that ash is a form of rust?

wikipedia says that ash "...consist mostly of metal oxides."

In a chemical sence, Is the process of something burning similar to the process of something rusting?

Update:

I'm a leyman...so if you would water down the technical language, I would appreciate it.

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Hi Julian,

    Fire IS a rapid oxidation...however, 'rust' is the result of ferrous oxidation only, so refers only to iron itself of compounds of iron such as steel, etc.

    Ash is the end result of any oxidation (fire) process, so 'rust' could be described as a form of ash, but ash is not (necessarily) a form of rust.

    Ash is the residue left after burning, so can be formed from wood or any other inflammable material. The clue is probably in the description you give where you say 'fire is the rapid oxidation of a substance' The word 'rapid' moves rust away from the 'ash' description (except, loosely, as I described above) Rust is, of course, a 'slow' oxidation.

    Technically, and in a pure scientific way, rust and fire ARE allied and could be considered similar.

    Hope that helps,

    BobSpain

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It would be better phrased as: rust is a form of ash. Ash is an oxidation product of many metals; rust is an oxidation product of iron.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.