Worst candidate for president and why?

Ron Paul is the best candidate for President because he's the only one who supports the United States Constitution in it's entirety and he's the only candidate who will tell the American people the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

The rest of the candidates are tied for last place because they all support the privately owned monopoly otherwise known as the Federal Reserve. When was the last time Guiliani, Fred Thompson, Romney, McCain, Clinton, Obama, Edwards or Richardson said a single word about the negative impact upon your life of that the owners of the Federal Reserve are perpetuating by promoting deficit spending and currency inflation?

They haven't said a word and they won't say a word because they are merely puppets disguised as politicians. Ron Paul has a spine. He stands on his own two feet. He tells the truth.

We may not always like the truth but it is better than being sold a pack of lies. Which would you rather have?

Richardson....he has proven time and time again to not be very bright at all. People criticize Bush on intellect...wait till this man became President. It would make Bush look like quite the scholar.

In the Democratic Party I find Biden and Hillary to be the only real acceptable candidates for President for a number of reasons (not to say I support them however...although I do like Biden much more than Hillary).

In the Republican Party I have not reached much conclusion as yet (I am a Republican). I would have to say McCain is the worst of the lot on the Republican side however. He stands for many wrong things, and does so proudly.

"Cut her losses"?

As for Obama, to begin Illinois is #9, according the AAA. Additionally, a Senator has no control over state laws and taxes, so even if they were #1, he would have anything to do with it.

Additional Note: Give me all the thumbs-down you want. The fact is the statment about Obama is completely irrelevant to anything going on with his campaign (and factually incorrect, too). So, think for a moment as to whether you give me a thumbs-down because my answer was wrong or illogical, or simply because you'd rather believe something wrong because you don't like Obama.

#1 - Hillary - countless reasons, #1 being she is the most divisive figure running, not what our country needs - to be further divided - and will be constantly the focus of energy and time-consuming witch hunts throughout her administration.

#2 - Giuliani - Has little to offer other than the coincidence of being the mayor of NYC when 9/11 happened. Not a genuinely smart man.

And I'm more of a liberal than anything.

Rudy Giuliani, because he's the biggest hypocrite, the biggest liar, and the candidate who has done the most to tie himself to Bush. Face it, if his term in office had ended on September 10, 2001, his candidacy would be a bigger joke than that of the lunatic Ron Paul.

Giuliani= was a mediocre mayor who only became famous after the 9/11 photo op. Besides, he won't make it through the Republican primary with his liberal views on abortion and gay marriage. Not a bad cross dresser, however.

Well Obama is good and if you look gas is high everywhere. The reason IL is the highest is because Chicago is there and its the biggest city in the middle, the hub for everything.

Any Republican. Romney is probably the worst, though. He is crazy. Might be worse than Bush, as hard to believe as that is. Can't think of anyone else alive that would be worse than Bush.

Rudy would be very bad, too.

John Edwards. His hair is great and all, but he'd have us in a depression with his crazy protectionist policies, within the week.

Anyone from the Bush family.-Self Explanatory