Gun Free Zone - Protects or hurts?

Question

Since most the shootings and killings that occur in the US take place at "gun free zones" would not having gun free zones make us safer? 

Example, Columbine - school / V-Tech - College / Mall shooting in Omaha.


When these people snap, they go and target areas where people are gun free and helpless. Would things be different if there weren't gun free zones and American citizens were able to bare arms. Like the constitution calls for? 

And this would not only be for pyschos on shooting sprees. Do you think the average criminal would think twice about robbing a gas station or anyone or anything if he thought that maybe he would be shot and killed in doing so?

joe diddley · Accepted Answer

maybe.  but, everyone who enters the zone should be required to pass hourly psychological tests.

Sophie B · Answer

I have a concealed carry permit and a S&W .38 police special

That said.... I think everyone should carry a 45 calibre six-shooter old west gunslinger style..

If everyone in the gas station was showing a weapon, everyone would be on their best behavior.......

Lala Bush · Answer

So you'd rather have a shootout in every mall and movie theater?  Sounds like a GREAT idea.

Nosferatu · Answer

Yes it would be safer. There is less crime in areas that citizens are able to own and/or carry firearms.

~ Floridian`` · Answer

A-men, Brother...I totally agree!

Shana B · Answer

You make a very good point. Criminals don't follow the rules that make it "gun free", that's what makes them criminals.

Trending News

Gun Free Zone - Protects or hurts?

6 Answers