Global Warming = Global Regulations ?

Awesome question, you get a star!

It's nice to know someone sees through the B.S. to the base agenda. It doesn't help that legislation is already being initiated to force U.S. Citizens to undergo annual "green evaluations" and purchase "carbon credits" from Al Gore's company.

I used to think Gore was just a misdirected idiot. His latest scheme to steal billions of dollars from Americans is genius at least! The pro-Gore crowd just parrot his drivel like it's fact and will doom us all to ANOTHER TAX!!!

Yes, there is a great danger of One World Government here. Seeing which countries are excluded from Kyoto, one could easily suggest it benefits the communist ones, the very ones in favor of world government.

The case for or against man made global warming I leave to the scientists.

The politics of Kyoto seems racist as it unfairly targets mostly White nations while giving Black and Asian nations a free pass.

I and most conservatives agree that we need stricter environmental laws, but for all nations equally. This way way we can still be equal trading partners.

There is no reason to believe that this 10,000-year-old cycle of solar-induced warming and cooling will change. Dr. Sallie Baliunas, an astrophysicist with the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and one of the nation's leading experts on global climate change, believes that we may be nearing the end of a solar warming cycle. Since the last minimum ended in 1715, Baliunas says there is a strong possibility that the Earth will start cooling off in the early part of the 21st Century.

Liberal "Kyoto Treaty types" always give the communist Chinese a free pass. China has spent hundreds of billions of dollars on their military and offensive space-based weapons but cannot afford Kyoto? I wonder if having the worlds largest army has anything to do with it?

I think if an international community is created against global warming that would be a good thing. I dont want my children to live in a world where everything in nature is being threaten because human beings believe that we control the world and nothing else matters and as long as theres money nothing else is worth saving. But i dont agree in have a one world gov. Each country is different and have different views and thus those values should be respected. But i do agree that the USA should bow to a global warming authority.

There has been no global warming for the last 15 years, according to the data. So, all we had to do was wait. As for your unequivocally FALSE claim that "Almost all scientists say there is ample evidence for man-made global warming due to carbon dioxide emissions," I am truly amused. As more and more real data is collected, the more it contradicts the theory of man-made global warming (or climate change). I'll follow the data, because that is what science is about. MMGW is more dependent upon faitth than data.

Global Warming = Global Taxation.

The United States should never bow to another power.

I think this is the real threat behind the global warming craze.

no, no fear of that. However, this would make certain 3rd world nations comply with the rest of us. There used to be a copper smelting plant not too far from where i live. This plant was 15 miles from mexico. As soon as the regs got too expensive, they shut the plant down and moved it to mexico (Cananea Sonora from Douglas, Az). With the wind pattern, Arizona is actually getting more pollution than it was, and many americans were out of a job. arghh

Global Warning: The earth isn't flat!

Does the USA have the right to ruin the entire planet, with effects on all other people?

The International community can't force us to do anything we don't sign on for, but if they choose to put tariffs on all our goods, and but trade embargoes on us because people like you want to act like spoiled brats, they can do so and we will be worse off for it, in addition to being worse off for doing nothing to stop the damage we are doing to the planet.

If we agree to certain standards, we're not bowing to others, we're agreeing to act a certain way, of our own accord.

Liberals and socialists want this. The Constitution does not allow our sovereignty to be given to an outside entity.

The goal of these people is to destroy capitalism and the United States.