Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Bizzare question about explosives! [Don't worry, I'm not trying to make a bomb! See below.]?

Most explosives work by a chemical reaction that creates a large amount of gas pressure very fast to split rock, destroy something etc. And, it is known that applying pressure will shift the equilibrium of a reaction that forms gases towards the side with the least number of moles of gas (reactants side in the case of explosives). If you were to make some kind of containment system that was so strong it could not be blown up (like some very very heavy-walled metal chamber; I'm talking several yards thick walls [or something like that]) and filled a relatively small cavity in it with TNT, PETN or similar explosive material so there was no void space whatsoever and hermetically sealed the chamber with some means whereby the "door" was just as strong as the walls so there was no way it could blow out and the charge was set off by remote control in some manner; would the material be able to explode? Or maybe a small portion, then the reaction would be quenched?

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I understand the basics of your question, but let me restate them incase I missed something:

    If an explosive device was sealed in an impenetrable structure with no airspace and detonated, would it explode? (or how well would it explode)..

    Basically, it'd pressurise itself as it exploded, and thereby only partially explode (assumee it didn't need oxygen in it's reaction). The pressurization would equalize immediately afterwards, perhaps in-time to detonate as a secondary explosion, but I doubt it. The explosive force would be minimized though because there's no "weak spot" for the explosion to flow towards.

    Or at least that's my best estimate, based on experience and my understanding of your question.

  • 1 decade ago

    More than likely you would have a pressurized room waiting to expell like gas in a propane tank. The force is gone, but now you have expansion of molecules. Depending on the type of explosive you use, that is. Powders and non gas explosives would just leave no pressure, and gas explosive and chemical would expand and create pressure.

    And the force of the explosion and/or expansion would depend on the amount of oxygen you had in the room, since it takes oxygen to mix with all to burn or expand.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    relatively, definite, i think of he's over-reacting. yet then, i'm no longer able to truly criticise as i do no longer comprehend for confident i does no longer over-react if I have been dealing with a similar determination. From what i've got seen, the missiles have not got the variety to realize Hawaii, so does not look a great number of a raffle on the 2nd, and although in the event that they did that's via no ability particular that North Korea is bored to death in latest and desires to influence the U. S.. Come on, after what handed off to the jap after Pearl Harbor you may think of human beings might have learnt the lesson...

  • Tom
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Most explosives react even more rapidly under pressure. The reaction would complete and you would have a VERY high pressure area in the casing.

  • 1 decade ago

    yeah im guessing it should be able to because the explosive force from the bomb, would force dents in the container but would not destroy it.

    Source(s): my brain
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.