Which is better for a player's team, scoring 51 points on 28 shots, or scoring 48 points on 44 shots?

the first one

51 points on 28 shots is a pretty damn good percentage. But the real questions should be how many assists? How many charges did you take? How many steals? How many free throw attempts. Being a great scorer is just that, but to be an all around player you must be well rounded in all areas. Examples: Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant. They came into the league with weak areas and were able to work hard at them and become all-defensive players.

I would take scoring 48pts and 44shots, including the game-winner!

Look LBJ is a great better, maybe better than Kobe in a few years, but Kobe has all the experiences in the playoff, finals, all the big stages. His clutch performence is unmatched right now in the NBA.

People need to stop comparing LBJ and Kobe, they are both great, I think Kobe has a slight edge right now.

You don't have to love LBJ and hate Kobe, you can enjoy both of their talent.

How about Player 3

Omg Rip Hamilton shot 73 % from FG HE must be the best !!

Scored 39 in 22 shots !! and their team didnt have to go to OT!!!! Rip is Teh Best!!!!

KOBE...and the WIN...is that what you thought?

big ups to mike J!!

ALPHA WOLF SUCKS!