Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
5 Answers
- tincanpullerLv 51 decade agoFavorite Answer
Prime Minister Simon Cowell, of course.
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
- bmwdriver11Lv 71 decade ago
There wouldnt be a President, there would be a Prime Minister. And the Prime Minister would likely be Nancy Pelosi. The party with the most ministers selects the PM, and since they selected her for the leader of the House, it stands to reason they would have selected her as PM. However, that may or may not hold water, a lot of the bearing on who gets selected as the leader of the House of Reps is tenure length. In a Parliamentary system, tenure doesnt matter nearly as much.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
It's a hard question to answer, because we would not have two houses the way we have no with the Senate and House of Representatives. However, based on the sheer number of members, it's likely that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi would be chosen to lead our government and would act as Prime Minister.
- Songbyrd JPA ✡Lv 71 decade ago
There would be a president, the chief of state, while Nancy P. would be prime minister, head of government. The reason there would be a President, since we do not have Royalty, we would have to have a Face for the world. The Queen of the United Kingdom is head of state in there.
Who then would be president? Since it would be a ceremonial position, where smarts don't matter, Bush. This one.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.