Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Advanced Trigonometry help needed, sinx = -4cosx... anyone?
I am going through a past Additional Maths (OCR) paper, and I have no idea how to do this question;
Find all the values of x in the range of 0 < x < 360 (degrees) that satisfy sin x = -4 cos x.
The question is worth 5 marks on the paper!
Additionally, any good revision sites for this paper would be appreciated =D
6 Answers
- mohanrao dLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
sinx = -4cosx
divide by cosx
sinx/cosx = -4
tanx = -4
x = 104 or 284 degrees in the interval 0-360 degrees
- 6 years ago
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
Advanced Trigonometry help needed, sinx = -4cosx... anyone?
I am going through a past Additional Maths (OCR) paper, and I have no idea how to do this question;
Find all the values of x in the range of 0 < x < 360 (degrees) that satisfy sin x = -4 cos x.
The question is worth 5 marks on the paper!
Additionally, any good revision sites for...
Source(s): advanced trigonometry needed sinx 4cosx anyone: https://shortly.im/pdl89 - 1 decade ago
Let x=arccosy.
By sin(arccosθ)=√(1-θ^2), we get sinx=sin(arccosy)=√(1-y^2).
So we can derive by arccos(cosθ)=θ, -4cosx=-4y.
√(1-y^2)=-4y
Squaring both sides gives
1-y^2=16y^2
Adding y^2 to both sides gives
1=17y^2
So y = 1/√17
So x=arccos(1/√17).
I'd say, therefore, 1 value. I'm checking it though, so I might turn out some mistake.
----------edit--------------------
Mαtt is actually correct, but I don't know where his argument or mine fell apart. His answer relies on the fact that tanθ=sinθ/cosθ.
sinx = -4 cosx
Dividing both sides by cosx yields
sinx/cosx=-4
Applying tanθ=sinθ/cosθ,
tanx=-4
Taking the arctans of both sides to invert tan gives
x=arctan(-4).
I think that the fallacy occurs in that I create x off another variable, but I still can't spot any errors.
- 1 decade ago
sinx = -4cosx
=>sinx+4cosx=0
=>(sinx+4cosx)/√[1²+4²]=0
=>(sinx+4cosx)/√17=0
{
let cosΘ=1/√17
sin²Θ=1-cos²Θ
=1-1/17=16/17
=>sinΘ=4/√17
}
=>sinxcosΘ+cosxsinΘ=0
=>sin(x+Θ)=0
=>x+Θ=0,180,360
=>x=-Θ or 180-Θ or 360-Θ
only the last two lie in the intervel
thus
x=180-Θ or 360-Θ whr Θ=cos-1(1/√17)=75.963756532073521417107679840844
x=180-76=104
or
x=360-76=284
Or simply
sin x = -4 cos x.
tanx=-4
x=tan-1(-4)
-75.963756532073521417107679840837
180+of that
or 360+of that
so we get the same ans
x=104 or 284
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Moise GunenLv 71 decade ago
sin x+4 cos x=0
exist a number a with propriety :
cos(a) =1/sqrt(17)
and
sin(a)=4/sqrt(17)
a exist because
(1/sqrt(17))^2+(4/sqrt(17))^2=1
then I rewrite :
sin x* cos(a)+sin a*cos x=0
sin(x+a)=0
from here :
x+a=k pi (k any integer, pi=3.1415......)
x=-a+kpi
and a = arcsin(4/sqrt(17))
- MαttLv 61 decade ago
sin(x) = -4cos(x)
tan(x) = -4
x = arctan(-4)
Which does not have a solution on the range 0 < x < 360
ƒ