Is Al Gore telling the truth about Global Warming, or is he a liar.?

That depends on what your definition of "is" is.

all the best lies contain an element of truth - there is a legitimate scientific debate to ascertain the impact of human activity on climate.

BUT' an inconvenient truth' is pure propaganda designed to exaggerate the consequences and to sell the Globalist "solution" which includes carbon tax which will destroy the middle class business of the western world and to build up public support for "eugenics" which in this context is the culling of billions of the world population.

This was first promoted by the "Club of Rome" in the 1968 funded by the Rothschilds and chaired by David Rockefeller which was the beginning of the modern "environmental"

movement.

Henry Kissinger promoted the ideas of population reduction in 1974, using famines, disease and war. Kissinger to this day is a go-between betwen every US President and the Rothschilds and other Luciferians of the secret government who are behind them. Gore is one of their stooges too. BTW the Rothschilds are also behind the CFR

.

It is not a matter of truth or a lie. The Gore position, although presented as fact, is really a compendium of theories about the effects of and the causes of global warming. Read his book, probab;ly available in paperback or at a used bookstore by now, and also check out the references. Then you can decide for yourself.

Gore seems to have found his groove. He will make buckets of money being a fear monger and won the Nobel Prize for goodness sake. Even the Climate Guru's can't make up their minds. We need to get everyone together and do a REAL Scientific study with Proof. Historians should also be included,as the records of our past may be studied. Thomas Jefferson writes of a terrible drought that lasted 3 years.Jamestown colonist had unusual freezing.Thats way before the automobile or factories. It's part man made but part nature and theirs only so much to be done.

Thermometers aren't influenced by Al Gore, or big oil.

They say worldwide temperatures are down by a degree.

Its already having an effect on the weather and growing seasons that have led to overseas famines due to drought and too early warmth. The argument is really over whether or not its pollution thats causing it or whether its part of a natural cycle. It could even be part of a natural cycle made worse by pollution.

Even if its not, even if business has to spend some of its sacred profits to clean up its act, I'm tired of them using my air and water as an open sewer.

I'm not going to sit here and write a huge thesis on why global warming is or isn't caused by humans. But I will say Al Gore is full of shlt. He lies, he's a hypocrite and has a very large incentive for pushing his agenda. Check out the 35 mis-truths of "An Inconvenient Truth". That will give you a little perspective on his credibility. Scientists on both sides of the global warming issue have criticized him because his "documentary" was full of nonsense, bad science, and outright lies. And I hate to be one of those people who criticizes someone's lifestyle because I believe people should be free to live how they please. However, the second someone starts waving their finger at me telling me I need to "be a steward of the earth and stop consuming so much, otherwise I'm a bad person", that's when it opens the door to do it right back. Gore says we should cut way back, consume less fuel, have smaller houses and so on, when he's literally flying around the planet in his private jet that consumes more fuel in one trip than my car does in 6 months. Not to mention, driving around in a Prius claiming that he's "green" when his entoroage is surrounding him in 5 full sized Chevy Tahoe. And finally, he owns stakes in a company that sells carbon credits. Don't you think it's peculiar that he stands to make a fortune if our country enacts this ridiculous carbon credit policy??? He's nothing more than a profiteer that's willing to see American freedoms widdled down to nothing while he banks millions off people that want nothing more than to live life the way they want without being forced to buy something as nonsensical as carbon credits.

EDIT: Oh yeah, I almost forgot. He also credits himself with the invention of the Internet. His intentions sound genuine don't they?

Bluntly, he is a liar. The earth temperature has gone up 0.5 degrees in the last century and he used extreme scare tactics to make people believe otherwise. While humans may have contributed to Global Warming (maybe .001%), people must realise that this is a natural cycle that has repeated endlessly since the beginning of the Earth.

The globe is getting hotter and hotter...over the last 50 years the rate of warming has been rapid...effects of this can be seen everywhere...as to what series of events is causing this, that is the point of debate...I do think burning fossil fuels has contributed...but he is NOT completely lying...maybe a few details are off...

I doubt that he's intentionally lying , but that doesn't mean that everything he says is so . He says it as he sees it , but scientists don't know whether the global warming that is measurable is caused by human activity , or one more of many warm spells and ice ages that have occured over the last couple of million years .

It depends on if he is a CFR member or not - I think he may be on there member list - if so that would be a disappointment but there are other educated Politicians that are third parities and they are not CFR members and they too have lots of concern on global warming so that causes me to be a believer. Why should we take a chance on near future generations losing the planet. I would think that People who have children should not want to risk it .

Well, I happen to think he's telling the truth about global warming, but he is a politician after all. Shame fer shame....

Why couldn't he get someone from Exxon Mobil to present this? That would have a lot more impact, methinks. :P