Do you think there should have been Golden Point extra time in last nights City Vs Country match?

Yes because if it were a regular game they wouldve but then no because it made history.. i no we didnt get a result but still.. shows the strength in both sides..

no a draw was fine, the game didnt mean much just tradition so why should the players have to kill them selves for a win it was a draw both teams were as good as each other .we dont need players risking injury for a win that wont get you anything. its a one off game played for the tradition and maybey a couple of origin spots so a draw was the perfect result hey its was the first draw since 1933 i think channel nine said so that was a great result and a great game .

The players have to back up for their clubs, some of them the next day so playing Golden point they would've been stuffed.

there has neva been golden factor.. city vs usa is about representing the position ur from with delight & u both are both matched or winner/loser.. theres no comp factors to play 4 so its a honest honest recreation this way

yes because we wanted to see a winner.. no because most players had to back up the night after the match and it would have made them even more tired.

It was a nothing game - just a trial for Origin.

The clubs want thier players for the weekend games so they wouldn't want to play forever

yes i think there should have been golden point cos then country could have shown that they where the better of two teams lol

yeah there should've been extra time. i was enjoying seeing all nsw's player belt sht out of each other. the more time the better. would've been good to see a winner also.

Yes because it would have gave more time 2 belt the shi..t out of each other