Who is more dangerous?

Someone with everything to lose...They become threatened and do ANYTHING possible to make sure their world doesn't come crashing down...Someone with nothing to lose are more obvious and careless...

In my opinion, someone with nothing to lose.

Explanation: If someone has nothing to lose, then they don't care if YOU have anything to lose either.

So they are more dangerous, because they make do something to hurt or kill you also.

Source: I love cops, and shows like that. And a lot of times they arrest, or pursue someone with "nothing to lose", and they end up being shot, because they try to shoot, or run over, or injure police in some way.

Someone with nothing to lose of course.

My answer is someone with nothing to lose, hence, they have lost everything...

Someone who has everything to lose is more likely to stop at all costs to keep what they already have.

But, if someone has everything to lose, and they are already going to lose it, and they know it, then they are logically more dangerous, more anger of losing what they worked hard for.

Someone with nothing to lose!!!

Someone w/ nothing to lose. They may not care about anything.

someone with nothing to lose

Someone with nothing to lose. They can basically do whatever they want and not have a consequence.

someone with nothing to lose!

someone with nothing to lose.