If sea levels continue to rise, due to an increase in CO2 in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels?

You need to consider not only how much land would be underwater, but also how populated that land is. Most of the land lost to rising sea levels is highly populated.

You must also take into account that the location of the storage of nuclear wastes is under some degree of control. However, no one has control over what land is flooded due to rising sea levels.

old nuclear waste fuels dont take up land they get stored underground, but they're not the answer and having rising sea levels certainly wont help anyone. electricity can be produced very effectively in offshore wind farms, out of everyone's way

advantageous link! i've got been blocked from answering too. curiously some anybody is fairly, fairly threatened by utilising scientific evidence? Cognitive dissonance must be an incredibly complicated state to stay in... "Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling brought about by utilising protecting 2 contradictory innovations concurrently. The "innovations" or "cognitions" in question might comprise attitudes and ideology, and additionally the know-how of one's habit. the belief of cognitive dissonance proposes that individuals have a motivational stress to decrease dissonance by utilising changing their attitudes, ideals, and behaviors, or by utilising justifying or rationalizing their attitudes, ideals, and behaviors.[a million]" despite the fact that it facilitates doing not something interior the face of overwhelming evidence. I ought to recognize people who've that kind of verify, regardless of if i will not be able to condone the eventual international genocide bring about this actual case. I do discover it interesting that i became blocked right this moment when I reported that the argument over technology became pointless using fact the CO2 help proposals fail to redue international CO2. not one of the treaties in place or proposed have any help objective, and that they fail to comprise even an consumer-friendly international CO2 length to decide effects. they are in fact not approximately CO2 in any respect. they only sell (and if carbon determining to purchase and merchandising is lined, they help pay for) the migration of industry to coming up international locations. i became blocked as quickly as I reported that the pointless debate in simple terms served as a distraction to stay away from precisely that kind of learn and criticism of the present lopsided CO2 administration schemes.