Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
9/11 Conspiracy motive?
If the 9/11 conspiracy is true what could possibly be the motive? Who planned it? If it was Bush and his cabinet members, why would he want to do something like that knowing it would tarnish (ruin) his reputation, put him on death row, and give him a bad name for all of eternity?
20 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
I suggest these two films to learn about potential geopolitical reasons for 9/11.
Mike Ruppert's film, "The Truth and Lies of 9/11". It covers potential geopolitical motives as well as current and historical criminality and corruption at the top levels of government (democrat and republican). The film is a few years old, but still relevant.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8797525979...
or read his book "Crossing the Rubicon". Great efforts have been made to marginalize and silence Ruppert, including poisoning. Why has he not been sued for libel for the film and the books? In his words, "the truth is the perfect defense against libel".
That Ruppert film also covers the geopolitical ideology of Obama's sr. foreign policy adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski (as set out in this book "The Grand Chessboard"). Brzezinski was "prophetic" in predictions that a "9/11 like event" would be needed to move the war plans forward. I find it troubling that there seems to be a reluctance on the part of Obama supporters to acknowledge Brzezinski's associations to globalist organizations such as the Trilateral Commission and his geopolitical ideology for the Middle East and elsewhere.
Another good film explaining potential geopolitical motives is Barry Zwicker's film, "The Great Conspiracy, The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw"
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-652981397...
Also research the neoconservative think tank "Project for a New American Century" and their links to and positions in the Bush Administration. Learn who the members are then read their document "Rebuilding America's Defenses. Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century". Until recently, that document was available from the PNAC web site, but it seems that web site has been taken down. I saved the PDF, and fortunately so did these people (there is a link for it on this page)
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article32...
Also, learn about New World Order and what it means to George H.W. Bush.
Clearly criminals inside the government facilitated the 9/11 attacks. Were they directly involved over and above that? Many believe so. I believe so as well, but don't subscribe to the "total inside job" explanation.
Either way, the geopolitical incentives don't change. What also doesn't change is that 9/11 WAS EXPLOITED TO THE FULLEST to advance those objectives, to start the dismantling of American civil liberties, and to justify the tightening of the "police state" in America.
Lastly, learn about the role the main stream media plays with regard to 9/11, the Iraq War and the war on terror. If you want some links for that, please e-mail me.
If criminals in the Bush Administration were involved in the events of 9/11, you must know that a switch to a democratic president won't change much. The powers behind foreign policy are higher than the government, and they include the Council on Foreign Relations. Obama and McCain are both CFR members.
- 5 years ago
Wow Kojak, you are angry! Maybe you've been listening to US propoganda a little too much to suggest that there has been an attack on the US (somewhere in the world) almost every month since 1979, and that this is justification enough to go to war. Wow, that really is a frightening view. Do you have any idea how many civillians have died as a result of US military aid, or direct US military action before 9/11( mainly because the US did not like the results of democratic elections held in other countries)? I don't know what that figure is, but it is going to be a great deal more than the 3,000 or so souls that perished on 9/11 2001. It is that arrogant, one-sided view that you exhibit that made the US a target; 9/11 was only the lid coming off the pan, the situation had been boilling for years. As for the main question - like most people here, I have not enough subject matter knowledge to comment, and have not read enough to be persuaded that a contolled demolition took place, but I certainly have read enough to make me question what the US Government knew of the 9/11 conspiracy.
- 1 decade ago
There are many motives. I'm certain more than you could possibly imagine. Bush is a puppet controlled by the government behind the government. He was all too willing to comply with the 9/11 false flag operation. Motive #1, start the oil wars but of course you can't say it's about oil so you need a far better reason to invade sovereign nations. Enter the never ending war on terrorism. The oil wars begin. Bush not only gets to settle an old score of his father's with Sadaam Hussein but also gets to serve the groups most dear to Cheney and himself, the Bildeberg Group, George HW Bush a member, has profitted enormously from the wars as has the Halliburton Co. (Cheney former CEO) and of course the oil companies and many others.
On a more grand scale it accelerates the movement toward the NAU and then a 1 world government.
- 1 decade ago
Those in power often abuse that power with little regard for the people. That's a historical fact.
We may never know all the facts. Who was involved? Why? The truth is the "official version" doesn't make any sense.
I believe the reason why is because they wanted the two very profitable wars we are now in. And they also wanted the so-called terrorism but actually anti-Constitution legislation to be readily accepted by the masses. It's working pretty well for them. But I'm sure they would like to have a little more support for the war. The legislation was no problem.. seeing as the PEOPLE don't have time to read and fail to inform themselves these days.
It's all about POWER and MONEY. Don't believe for a second that those in Washington REALLY care about the people.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- EmilyLv 41 decade ago
I wrote a paper on the 9/11 conspiracy and I'll post the link on the bottom, but the real motive comes from a group called. PNAC= The Project for the New American Century. This group of people from washington. (coincidentaly mostly from the Bush administration) wrote a document and you can look it up on google. (its a pdf file) that wanted to make america the new world power,and they wanted to make a new world order, and to establish this they needed more military bases, they needed to eliminate middle eastern leaders that would interfere, and they needed more money in the military budget. When 9/11 happened this group gained a lot more power and "POOF" all those things magically happened. a bit strange huh? i know its a lot of info but its all true.
anyways here the link
- 1 decade ago
it's funny when people say 'Bush & his cabinet members' did it all by themselves! the plan actually originated in 1984. your attitude & that of people like you is why he isn't on death row. he got away with it because you let him.
the fact that silverstein admitted on national television that he gave permission to demolish WTC7 is enough evidence for me. to demolish a huge building neatly like that needs enormous preparation & therefore he must have known about it before 9/11:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV1...
the WTC was also no longer viable.
its construction had already begun before the use of asbestos was banned in 1971, so spray-on asbestos fire retardant was used up to the 64th floor & a different insulating material was used for the remaining floors.
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2001/9/12/...
permission to have the towers demolished had been refused & the cost of the alternative, to dismantle it floor by floor, was enormous.
despite this, silverstein decided to lease the WTC six months before 9/11 & promptly insured the buildings against 'terrorist' attacks. he put a down-payment of $125 million for the lease, then claimed for two separate attacks (2 planes) & was rewarded $7 billion.
that wasn't THE motive, but i don't think you would be able to comprehend the real reasons for the invasion of Iraq.
- tigeressLv 71 decade ago
The theory is that the CIA provided Bush with a report that stated that the US was about to be attacked and Bush chose to ignore it. Bush chose to ignore it because he was looking for an excuse to attack Iraq and needed a good story to tell the American people. If this theory is true, Bush/Cheney probably thought that it would be kept top secret.
There is no doubt that the world is a better place without Saddam in it, but at what cost to the US?
Bush's reputation is already ruined for eternity, but he won't do time. The real records will be sealed for 50 years and Bush will get a pardon. Bush is an arrogant, neo-consertive whose reckless incompetence played havic with American lives. MCCain will not only be the same, he will be 10 times worse. He is old and out of touch with reality.
Vote Obama 2008
Source(s): The Prosecution of GW Bush by Vincent Bugliosi - Anonymous1 decade ago
I'm a Bush supporter who, for a long time, struggled with the 9/11 conspiracy theory. My sister worked in the towers, at Cantor Fitzgerald when the bombing took place in 1993, so I know that the WTC has been their main target of attack. I knew they would not stop until the towers fell.
I did countless hours of research on 9/11 - who would benefit and how, etc. I watched hours of theories AND the debunking of theories on youtube and read hundreds of pages of information.
I finally made my decision based on what I saw with my own two eyes. I was torn because of videos showing "squibs" shooting out of the WTC as it fell, the shots of air seemed to be coming out many floors below the collapsing floors. I then realized that the squibs were simply release points, either elevator shafts or areas of least resistant for the pressure to escape from. I also watched the moment when tower two fell and you could see the top portions "buckle" to one side, causing it to fall. They top of the building buckled in the direction of the plane impact.
So, because of the research I did and what I saw with my own two eyes, I believe it was not a conspiracy. I know people that worked in the towers and said that days before there were bomb sniffing dogs in the towers, so yes, they knew there was a threat... but unfortunately did not know exactly when or how it would be executed. You can always put pieces together to make it seem like a set up. That's my opinion. RIP all that perished on 9/11
- 1 decade ago
I think you need to watch the 911 movie.
The Bush family has ties, with the Bin Laden family. And the Bin Laden and the Bush family has stock in our countries home land security. So every time there is a breach and we have to increase anything they make money. And also the Bush family has stock in the oil, and every time the prices go up and we pay more, more goes in his and their families pocket. Watch the movie, it will make you mad. And then you can look up everything on line.
- 1 decade ago
It's called a "False Flag Operation". History is FULL of them. The government attacks it's own people/cities and blame it on an outside enemy... but the purpose is to sell a profitable war and often times new legislation that only serves to take liberties away from the people. All in the name of security.