Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
You make plane reservations for $1000, you get to the airport & DHS puts a Stun-gun bracelet on your wrist..?
whether you like it or not!
Your opinions please?
Yes...they are actually considering this.
9 Answers
- JBLv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
This can be considered a violation of the 4th and 14th amendment. And if they do try to put them on every passenger, I hope that the ACLU fights it.
I have heard about the bracelet, and was impressed with it's ability to stop a person. Having been on prisoner escorts, that's taking a fugitive from one state to another via a commuter plane, I look forward to using it. In the past I have had to put handcuffs on the prisoner and stand out in the crowd. This bracelet would be a lot more inconspicuous and stop the person without a foot chase through a crowded airport, or the fugitive trying to take a passenger hostage.
- 1 decade ago
If you've read any of Jeffrey White's other articles he tends to be very anti-airline, anti-government, etc. so please keep that in mind when reading this article.
After reading this response from the company that designed the bracelet, I actually wouldn't mind the bracelet at all.
Quoted from source:
"The bracelets remain inactive until a hijacking situation has been identified. At such time a designated crew member will activate the bracelets making them capable of delivering the punitive measure - but only to those that need to be restrained. We believe that all passengers will welcome deliverance from a hijacking, as will the families, carriers, insurance providers etc. The F-16 on the wing-tip is not to reassure the passengers during a hijacking, but rather to shoot them down. Besides activation using the grid screen, the steward / stewardess will have a laser activator that can activate any bracelet as needed by simply pointing the laser at the bracelet - that laser dot only needs to be within 10 inches of the bracelet to activate it."
As clearly stated there, the bracelets are inactive until a hijacking situation has been identified. So for all the anti-government, paranoid super-liberals out there screaming about accidental activation: You can stop now. I know loads of people will be protesting because "big brother" is monitoring them on the plane through these bracelets but the fact of the matter is: If you're not doing anything wrong, what's the big deal?
Personally if I'm on a plane I'd feel a lot safer knowing that in the case of a terrorist threat, there is a security measure in place to take the terrorist down other than an F-16 shooting the plane down. The fact that the bracelet is able to monitor the whereabouts of both you and your luggage after check-in is just a fringe benefit to me. One less boarding pass to get lost and less of a chance of my luggage going missing.
- 1 decade ago
When you get right down to it flying is a choice... the bracelets maybe going to a little bit of an extreme I myself would have no problem with wearing one but I can tell you if they tried to strap one on my 8 year old it would be unacceptable. I would drive her before that happened. To get a little more technical would it be something that is unable to be tampered with? Could a terroists get it off or even find a way of dismantling it, and if so what good are they going to be?
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I'd demand my $1000 back and drive!
And if everyone did that when it first came out, it would take about a week for them to stop doing it.
Fact is that sheeple will be okay with it and it will continue on.
- EbbyLv 41 decade ago
I've read about this and there is a big difference between considering it and actually doing it. I doubt something like this would "fly" so to speak but if it did then it's going to be a personal choice. To fly or not to fly.
Personally I wouldn't fly anymore. If anyone who has ever been hit with a tazer..........I don't think they would either cause that crud HURTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- trooper3316Lv 71 decade ago
That is a blog, it is not a reputable news source. All it states for certain is that a private company has invented a bracelet, there is nothing confirming it is actually being considered.
Source(s): 17 years law enforcement - The Violator!Lv 61 decade ago
I think I'd be immersing it when I wash my hands - unbelievable state of paranioa when you treat everyone like a would be criminal... especially when the REAL criminals are in the seat of power!
- 1 decade ago
I think I owuld choose to drive....I have no desire to be in a place that I can be controlled like that.