Creation, Evolution or Intelligent Design?

Creation.

Even if there were tons of evidence in evolution, what was there before? Read the Bible, and you'll find out. Read the book of Genesis.

The Bible existed way before Charles Darwin did. Besides, there are also lots of proofs in creation. Like the dragons that were in the medieval age were actually dinosaurs. Which means dinosaurs did exists at those times. And have you heard of ''The Great Flood''? That's why there are fish fossils found in top of mountains. You never know this because most of you haven't read, studied, and understood the Bible.

Intelligent design is creationism in a cheap suit, neatly relabled to try and get round the supreme court ruling of 1998, but with so much cut and pasted as to make it indistinguishable from the original.

Evolution, on the other hand, is actually based on the evidence that has been found rather than trying to bend the evidence into the dogma.

Nobody but the Supreme Being was present at the Creation, so many people claim many lies, like myths of evolution and intelligent design. Think a bit about it : do you really imagine water is the source of life, like many idolaters do?

Evolution is idolatry of water, and it's one of the biggest lies of history!

" Intelligent design " is a trying compromise between the truth and the lie, but it's an error, because compromise between the truth and the lie is impossible, as the definition of lie is the opposite of the truth.

The Lord created the Universe and all that is in it in literal six days, and if you don't believe it on earth, you will believe it after your death, when your spirit will ascend to heaven for judgment and you will see your Creator face to face!

Creation and Intelligent Design are one and the same. Intelligent Design is a misnomer - there's nothing intelligent about it at all.

Evolution is the only one of the three that has any evidence at all. Therefore it's the only one that makes sense.

Creationism and ID are one and the same. This is well exposed in Dr. Barbara Forrest's book "Creationism's Trojan Horse." All of the ID pushers are born-again Christians, with the exception of the Rev. Moon follower Jonathan Wells.

Dr. Dino is not a scientist and does not use the scientific method. He is a fraud, and a convicted felon serving jail time. So is his wife.

I accept the fact of evolution.

Roman Catholic Girl: You are a bit behind the times. The Vatican has accepted evolution as fact for decades. They even branch into other sciences, such as having their own celestial observatory in the SW of the States.

Creation/design.

One of the world's most famous scientists, probably the most famous living biologist, is Sir Francis Crick, the British co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, a Nobel Prize winner...In his autobiography, Crick says very candidly biologists must remind themselves daily that what they study was not created, it evolved; it was not designed, it evolved. Why do they have to remind themselves of that? Because otherwise, the facts which are staring them in the face and trying to get their attention might break through.

● Evolution is very much a fact.

● The theory of evolution is a theory - just like atomic theory and gravity theory. The word "theory" has a very specific meaning in a scientific context: THE THEORY EXPLAINS THE FACTS. See http://www.notjustatheory.com/

● Over 99.8% of scientists in relevant fields accept evolution.

● There are no alternative scientific theories.

● There is a huge amount of evidence in support of evolution...

● And zero evidence against it.

● The 'discussion' is actually educated people trying to educate others.

● The more intelligent a person is, the more likely they are to understand and accept evolution.

● The "discussion" only happens in backward places like Turkey and parts of the united states.

● There are two types of creationists: professionals who make money from books, lectures and such, and knowingly make false claims - and followers who accept those claims without understanding them.

● Examples of ridiculous creationist anti-science: http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=Thunder...

● Examples of creationist quote mining (like quoting part of a scientists' sentence to make it sound like he's saying something completely different): http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/quotes/mine/projec...

● Scientific American's 15 answers to creationist nonsense: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=15-answers-to-...

● The evolutionary tree: http://www.dhushara.com/book/evol/trevol.jpg

● Hominid species: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/species.html

● Transitional fossils: http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html

● A comprehensive list of evolution resources: http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&...

There's only one answer to this question. It's not a matter of opinion, it's a matter of fact. Evolution has a large amount of evidence, and it is the unanimous opinion of the scientific community that it has happened and continues to happen. To deny it in favor of the idea that a magical man in the sky created all life is just willful ignorance.

I accept and understand evolution, and recognize that it's the only one of the three that is supported by the evidence.

Evolution, because it actually has evidence we can make sense of, and its proof doesn't come in the form of a long boring contradicting book.