Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Which big three is better?

Boston's big three or the new rockets big three?

For me i would go for the Rockets, its bigger and better...

15 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Boston's, by a mile.

    Yao will not play another entire NBA season injury free until he stops playing for China in every spare second he has between NBA seasons. China won't let him NOT play, so he's going to be an injury problem every year from now until he retires. You can quote me on that one.

    T-Mac is very good, but he also seems to have back trouble every season, and age isn't going to help him injury-wise either. And without Yao, it doesn't matter how good T-Mac is the Rockets can't win in the playoffs without Yao. (see NBA Playoffs, 2008. for more info.)

    And Ron Artest? He can be a very good all-around player and is a rock solid defender too, but he's a burger and fries short of a Happy Meal if you know what I mean. At some point, he IS going to do something totally bone-headed either off the court or to T-Mac or Yao and find a way to alienate himself from everyone else. That's what Artest does and that's what he'll always do IMO.

  • 1 decade ago

    I prefer Boston's big three, not that the Rockets won't greatly improve with the addition of Ron Artest, but I feel that Boston's consistency would peril over Houston's. Also don't forget the role players that make every "big three" successful. I don't think the Rockets have a good supporting cast.

  • Matt
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Boston

  • 5 years ago

    those adult adult males have detrimental theory prossesing.. New Yorks would be extra useful.. Chris Paul is between the superb element guards. And him being on ny would provide Amare yet another super element to artwork with and get him a great number of seems.. Paul and Wade are the two susceptible defensively yet they gained't be protecting one yet another for the main section any way.. Carmelo is the 2nd superb one on one participant interior the league after Kobe Bryant. do not mistake me for asserting he's extra useful then Lebron he's not.. it is all a be counted of ways Lebron will ought to alter his activity with a view to play with Bosh and Wade.. Carmelo will nevertheless be a score first form of participant there fore he would win this conflict.. Carmelo isn't comprehend for his protection. neither is Lebron yet Lebron is a much extra useful defender then Carmelo. If he can shield Carmelo it incredibly is a Lebron style victory.. Bosh now ought to be between the main puffed up gamers in historic past.. He in basic terms regarded good as a results of fact he became the guy.. He constantly had the ball in Toronto.. Now while he gets it no person would even assume him to attain.. he's susceptible, has a detrimental submit activity and is a bad defender.. Amare will kill him.. This tournament up often is the actual X element maximum efficient to ny beating Miami.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Boston's big 3 is much better.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    None not even Lakers big three.

    Spurs big 3 are better them all if u see history for them

    Then Boston big3

    Lakers big3

    Hornets big 4

    Rockets big3

    Source(s): Rockets might take out TMAC to Detroit, then no big3 we are saying it will be big2
  • 1 decade ago

    Boston's big three for sure.

  • 1 decade ago

    Rockets are better if they all stay healthy and ron artest fits in well

  • 1 decade ago

    i'll go for new rockets big 3

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    rockets

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.