Can you help runaway and homeless children?

I have an American Express card. I'll check it out. /

attempting to help runaways, homeless, and lacking babies is extremely distinctive than locking human beings in penitentiary in the event that they decline to pay their money to fund a forms that announces to help runaways, homeless, and lacking babies. I assure you that i could be happy to freely cede my money to a charity or non-income that helps the underprivileged. yet why is it that such a good number of human beings think of this is powerful for the government to rigidity human beings, on the barrel of a gun, to cede their sources to help one subset of folk? i'm thoroughly against the thought that this is ok to rigidity (rob) somebody to pay for issues only because of the fact i think of they're ideal. It does not justify the immoral act of theft. in case you think of it does, then answer me this: could we arrest thieves who provide their stolen sources to the persons they think of choose it maximum? Does the reality that they did something extreme high quality with the money they stole by some skill nullify the act of rigidity used against yet another guy or woman to deprive them of their sources? one greater difficulty- for each application that the government undertakes, 5-20% of the money distributed is used to fund the overhead and pay the officers who run it. by using this very rational widely used, this is a actuality that government officers are incomes money off the homeless, runaways, lacking babies, and various of different of the weakest human beings in our society. not purely that, they're doing it by using forcing human beings to pay their salaries, that are by using a techniques, greater high priced than the salaries of the persons interior the interior maximum sector who're truthfully investment the plan. is this what you call morality?