OUR judging of persons is mostly wrong!?

Well, it’s true that we – as creatures with the ability to reason - make errors in judgement. I’d prefer to ‘blame’ it also on our social learning rather than only on the mind. We each do inherit certain predispositions and temperament, but the environment and social interactions also influence what we may eventually become.

The mind of a newborn baby is free of any kind of prejudice. In the process of growing up, children learn about the family or society that surrounds them. They are schooled in particular norms, standards and ways of thinking. It helps their socializing in organized society gaining membership in it.

In the process they adopt certain concepts/theories, make assumptions from them and develop certain attitudes to life and living. These are followed diligently in adulthood because that’s the way things are around them, and everybody behaves like that.

The point is individuals learn to conform. The ideals/beliefs they live by become sacrosant. It’s sacrilege to either question or reason. The herd instinct ensures faith, trust and loyalty for whosoever may become elders/leaders/authority...

Certainly we can change. We can reason as we’re equipped to, we can break the existing mindset. We can refuse to take any thing for granted and insist on independent decision making...But that needs hard work, the courage to leave the safety of the crowd, and the determination to walk new ground despite hardship or failure. Any takers?

You sound like a stay-and-enable-stay libertarian. solid. to respond to your question, we could each be the decide of our own movements. For me, incorrect is regardless of does harm to a different guy or woman--the two bodily, financially (e.g. stealing from them), or to their freedoms (e.g. balloting for a regulation to limit them from doing a splash otherwise innocuous interest). So for me, abortion isn't incorrect because of the fact a fetus isn't a man or woman. that's a _potential_future_ man or woman, yet no longer one now. Smoking a toke isn't incorrect as long because it is achieved at domicile, and not on the job or jointly as making use of whilst it would desire to bring about an accident. (i've got not at all smoked MJ and particular not at all will, yet I help its legalization.) i does not bypass so a ways as to declare that there is not any precise or incorrect, yet in maximum situations that's relative. If somebody believes abortion is misguided for non secular motives, they're unfastened to no longer get one. yet they shouldn't attempt to outlaw it for others. on the different hand, neither could they be compelled to pay for others' abortions during the taxes they pay. precise and incorrect, solid and evil are actually not black-and-white. there is lots of gray center floor. i think of a lot of human beings do no longer in basic terms like the uncertainty in contact with that, or that others would disagree as to what constitutes solid or evil. this is why many everybody is fascinated in the absolutes presented by making use of faith. It supplies them a feeling of justification and authority for his or her own ideals.

Who's "our" and who appointed you to be the spokesman of us/them all?.

Speak for yourself.