Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Do you think if I offered this trade he would accept?

He gets: David Garrard and Brandon Jacobs

I get: Derrek Anderson and Maurice Jones-Drew

Here's my team

QB: David Garrard

WR: Randy Moss

WR: Santonio Holmes

WR: Andre Johnson

RB: Brian Westbrok

RB: Ryan Grant

TE: Kellen Winslow

B: Matt Hasselback

B: Dwayne Bowe

B: Lee Evans

B: Chris Cooley

B: Brandon Jacobs

K: Nate Kaeding

DEF: Minnesota

B: Tennesse

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    HE would definately accept it, Garrard and Jacobs for Anderson and MJD. Look at it this way:

    1. Jacobs start full time MJD splits time with fred taylor.

    2. Anderson is injured and may not be ready for the season opener, he also is not playing very well right now.

    3. Garrard and Jacobs are both beasts, on the other side only MJD is a beast.

    4. Since u have matt hasselbeck to be ur starting QB and you would have 3 Beasts of runningbacks do the trade.

  • 1 decade ago

    VERY unlikely this would be accepted. Jacobs may split time as well as MJD, but MJD is still more valuable. Also, Anderson is a huge upgrade from Garrard, despite the concussion. Anyway, what is this, like a 6-team league?

  • 1 decade ago

    It's a push. Drew and Jacobs both split time. Bradshaw will take alot of Jacobs carries this year. I think Bradshaw may end up as the starter with jacobs getting the redzone carries.

    Gerrard won't put up the yds that Anderson will but he'll make up for it with TDs and no int's.

    And Hassellbeck is hurt and has no WRs. He'll have a horrible year.

  • 1 decade ago

    I don't think anyone would accept that trade, but I'm not sure you need to make it either. I would start Hasselback at QB. Garrard is good for a backup for matchups and bye weeks. You already have your starting 2 RBs and Jacobs isn't a bad bye week guy. All in all, I think you have a strong team right now.

    Check out my fantasy site http://sites.google.com/site/fantasyfootballopinio...

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Why the heck could you are attempting this? you may have the skill to get a greater appropriate RB than Lynch, who shares includes with Jackson AND is on a terrible charges offense. Lynch would possibly not score greater advantageous than 4 td's all year. Smith is the main concentrated wr interior the league. you have already got 2 studs in Moss and Fitz, so paying for and promoting Smith for a rb is a robust thought, yet you may get somebody so plenty greater appropriate than Lynch. Whoever provided you Lynch is attempting to sandbag you.

  • Mike
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    I doubt he will do that trade. I dont see how it really helps him. MJD and BJ are about the same back. Its pretty even deal right there. Anderson on the other hand is much better than Gerrard. I dont see how this deal helps the other guy

  • 1 decade ago

    if i were you i wouldn't do it Garrard will be a better QB then Anderson this year Anderson is already hurt and i Bet you He will lose him starting job this year.

  • 1 decade ago

    for sure he should, after all he needs a rb now since jones-drew is hurt

  • 1 decade ago

    I do not see why anyone would accept that trade...

  • 1 decade ago

    no

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.