Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Ive been made a offer... he wants my TE Jason Witten for Reggie Bush & Ben Watson? Good deal?

Witten is going to be a force this year on a team short of WR's. He's supposed to be the 3rd WR on the boys.

Thoughts, ideas, concerns...

Update:

I might also point out that Watson is doubtful for this weekends game vs the Chiefs. So I would be without a TE this wekend if I pulled the trigger on this

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Normally I would say ALWAYS take the RB. But Witten is looking to be their 3rd WR as well, so he'll always be on the field, even in long down situations. And most times he'll be their #2 option.

    I think it's a push. If you needed a RB, then I would pull the deal, because Watson will put up solid #s.

    Personally, I think Bush will come close to a 1000/1000 season, because of Shockey. LBs have to account for Shockey underneath and Bush will get a ton of open field opportunities....

  • Mike
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    It just depends on what you runningback situation is? Ben watson though right now is hurt and is not going to play this weekend so you gonna need a te in the short term as well. Also Bush is only good in ppr league. If you need a back its worth considering. Also Witten is the te but he might as well be the 2nd wr not 3rd, cause he is the 2nd passing option in that offense behind TO. Crayton is the 3rd or 4th option behind TO, Witten and barber.

  • 1 decade ago

    No, no, and NO! Ben Watson is still trying to recover form a foot injury and Reggie Bush is a BUST! Jason Witten IMO is the best tight end in the game and is worth his weight in gold. Keep Witten and tell whoever offered you that trade to go pound sand.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I would think about this one. Ben Watson is a good TE but Brady has a lot of other options. Reggie Bush could either have a break out year, or become a bust. I think it is a gamble.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    i would decline it bcause ben watson plays on the patriots with tom brady, randy moss, and wes welker.

    Ps all good players.

    Any way brady has better players to through to rather than the tight end benjamin watson.

    witten is good because 1 they have good qb t in tony romo also as you said cowboys are short on wide recivers so tony romo has a good chance of throuwing to him (witten)

    and personally i think reggie just sucks! take my advice decline the trade:)

  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    I wouldn't take the deal. Bush is coming off a year where he was hurt for the majority, and Watson probably won't play.

  • 1 decade ago

    Good trade for you. Watson killed it last year and get's a lot of goal line passes from Brady. Reggie is a bust kind of but he still gets TDs.

    Do the trade after this weekend?

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    you may actually not try this commerce. you're dropping way, way too lots at WR and RB. Witten might actual be an improve at TE, yet whether you have been paying for and promoting for Jimmy Graham as a replace, this commerce does not be best for you.

  • 1 decade ago

    Good deal WAtson and bush are going to be on fire

  • 1 decade ago

    hell no.

    watson is way better to trade.

    i put him as #1 TE cause Gates is still hurt with that toe.

    Watson dont get that much attention due to moss and many weapons.

    bush is a bust, McAlister is coming back soon to split carries.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.