Frankenstein: Mary Shelly????? who is the bigger monster?

So what you're asking is why the creature/monster might be worse than Victor? Since the creature is often thought of as rejected and mistreated, that's tough, but here are a few ideas:

Once the creature learns language and society from spying on the peasant family, he's no longer innocent. He's aware of his emotions, actions and what they might cause.

It's safe to say the creature murders William out of revenge, and even if he didn't, the fact Williams necklace ends up framing Justine is just too coldly calculated. Later, Victors wife Elizabeth and best friend Henry are killed by the creature when Victor destroys the female 'companion'. Victor's father dies because of this.

So - Victor created a being and abandoned it, the blame falls much on him. The creature is miserable and alone. Does that give the creature the right to take or spare a life? To give him the very right he's accusing his creator Victor of? That's like telling God "Do what I say, or I'll kill you and those you love." It doesn't work that way. The creature is just becoming the creator.

I personally liked Victor, but here's a list of his vices:

He is blinded by greed and self-ambition in the creation of the monster, not bothering to think about the consequences.

He knowingly lets Justine die.

He had the power to bring the monster pleasure by creating another of his specis, but denied him the right under the pretext that their children would destroy the earth. (Victor could've just taken out her organs for reproduction)

Hope this helped somewhat. Good luck.

First, I believe you that Victor replaced into the greater beneficial of two evils, even though it truly is a smart concept which you're able to have slightly relaxing with for the sake of your instructors. enable them to experience that they flexed your strategies slightly. The monster might desire to be worse than Victor by way of fact we are able to guess at what form of monster the human could be. some thing alongside the line of "greater beneficial the devil you be conscious of". human beings exceptionally lots stick to a variety that's why we are able to often profile maximum folk; you detect out what you are able to approximately what they did or what occurred to them of their previous and additionally you're able to fairly assume what they might do in accordance with particular movements. by way of fact the monster has no previous, or different confilicted pasts, he's completely unpredictable. How do you believe or take care of your self against some thing you do not comprehend, can not understand you and might't talk with you? Kill it? (there is the entire element of the arguement approximately is it precise to kill off what we worry, yet that doesn't make the monster undesirable) What if the human concept of killing in trouble-free terms makes issues worse? If Mary Shelly were portion of the widespread corps of writers she might have had the monster ruin into 1000 little monsters while it replaced into killed or had it suck in the soul of the guy who moved against it. yet books of her era had to have particular form of determination. Humanity had to win out. the different element you're able to desire to improve is the religious element of the argument that's what the superstitious Victorians have been maximum wound up approximately. A godless creature. A Golem.