Frankenstein: Mary Shelly????? who is the bigger monster?

I guess you could make the argument that although Victor is a big monster, his only flaw is curiosity which is a divine gift from God. If God gave us the brain capacity to overstep our natural bounds, then that in itself is natural. And anything from God cant be bad, right? The monster however loathes his creation and kills innocent people in an attempt to rectify his situation. The good book says thou shalt not kill, not thou shalt not create! This is a hard one. I would go off the fact that the monster is a killer - he is the antithesis to reasoning man. This all will base out of Christianity though, so if you can take that approach, you can really run with it. The bible argues that man is intrinsically good where as we know the monster, although he has human emotions, is intrinsically evil as his only wish is to end his creator. If you link Victor to God then it would be safe to say that the monster represents the wish to kill God because of his plight on earth, whereas man wishes to praise God because of their plight on earth. I don't know, you can take it or leave it but it's a start.

First, I believe you that Victor replaced into the greater beneficial of two evils, even though it truly is a smart concept which you're able to have slightly relaxing with for the sake of your instructors. enable them to experience that they flexed your strategies slightly. The monster might desire to be worse than Victor by way of fact we are able to guess at what form of monster the human could be. some thing alongside the line of "greater beneficial the devil you be conscious of". human beings exceptionally lots stick to a variety that's why we are able to often profile maximum folk; you detect out what you are able to approximately what they did or what occurred to them of their previous and additionally you're able to fairly assume what they might do in accordance with particular movements. by way of fact the monster has no previous, or different confilicted pasts, he's completely unpredictable. How do you believe or take care of your self against some thing you do not comprehend, can not understand you and might't talk with you? Kill it? (there is the entire element of the arguement approximately is it precise to kill off what we worry, yet that doesn't make the monster undesirable) What if the human concept of killing in trouble-free terms makes issues worse? If Mary Shelly were portion of the widespread corps of writers she might have had the monster ruin into 1000 little monsters while it replaced into killed or had it suck in the soul of the guy who moved against it. yet books of her era had to have particular form of determination. Humanity had to win out. the different element you're able to desire to improve is the religious element of the argument that's what the superstitious Victorians have been maximum wound up approximately. A godless creature. A Golem.