Actions the Palestinians have taken to bring peace ?

So far those actions seem either absent or in the far future. The very first action should be the renunciation of terrorism and the second, a willingness to recognize that there will be two states, Jewish Israel and Muslim Palestine between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. Until that happens, there will be no peace.

What have you Bush loving Evangelists done to bring peace? Ya Ya, wait for your false prophecy.

How about if the Palestinians switch off all of their bulldozers and stop demolishing jewish homes?

How about if the Palestinians stop using those Plutonium Enriched Cluster Bombs and give the jews a break?

How about the Palestinians stop shootin handcuffed prisoners?

How about the Palestinian illegal settlers stop using mob techniques and follow the laws of their county?

How about the Palestinian head honcho Mr. Saoul Mofaz stop asking from his soldiers 70 jews dead each and every day?

I agree these people are bad, real bad.

Steel out

I guess it's nice to live in "state of denial"

It is Israel and the United States that are radically violating international law. They are now seeking to consummate long-standing plans to eliminate Palestinian national rights for good.

There is near unanimity that all of this violates international law. The consensus was expressed by U.S. Judge Buergenthal in his separate declaration attached to the World Court judgment, ruling that the separation wall is illegal. In Buergenthal's words, "The Fourth Geneva Convention and International Human Rights Law are applicable to the occupied Palestinian territory and must therefore be fully complied with by Israel. Accordingly, the segments of the wall being built by Israel to protect the settlements are ipso facto in violation of international humanitarian law," which happens to mean about 80% of the wall.

Two months later, Israel's high court rejected that judgment, ruling that the separation wall, quoting, "must take into account the need to provide security for Israelis living in the West Bank, including their property rights." This is consistent with Chief Justice's Barak's doctrine that Israeli law supersedes international law, particularly in East Jerusalem, annexed in violation of Security Council orders. And practically speaking, he is correct, as long as the United States continues to provide the required economic, military and diplomatic support, as it has been doing for 30 years, in violation of the international consensus on a two-state settlement.

You can find detailed documentation about all of this in work of mine and others who have supported the international consensus for 30 years in print, explicitly. In Israeli literature, like Benny Morris's histories, you can find ample evidence about the nature of the occupation. In Morris's words, "founded on brute force, repression and fear, collaboration and treachery, beatings and torture chambers and daily intimidation, humiliation and manipulation, along with stealing of valuable land and resources." Like other Israeli political and legal commentators, Morris reserves special criticism for the Supreme Court, whose record, he writes, "will surely go down as a dark day in the annals of Israel's judicial system."

Keeping to the diplomatic record, the first -- both sides, of course, rejected 242. The first important step forward was in 1971, when president Sadat of Egypt offered a full peace treaty to Israel in return for Israeli withdrawal from the Occupied Territories. That would have ended the international conflict. Israel rejected the offer, choosing expansion over security. In this case, expansion into the Egyptian Sinai, where General Sharon's forces had driven thousands of farmers into the desert to clear the land for the all-Jewish city of Yamit. The U.S. backed Israel's stand.

Those decisions led to the 1973 war, a near disaster for Israel. The U.S. and Israel then recognized that Egypt could not be dismissed and finally accepted Sadat's 1971 offer at Camp David in 1979. But by then, the agreement included the demand for a Palestinian state, which had reached the international agenda.

In 1976, the major Arab states introduced a resolution to the U.N. Security Council calling for a peace settlement on the international border, based on U.N. 242, but now adding a Palestinian state in the Occupied Territories. That's Syria, Egypt, Jordan and every other relevant state. The U.S. vetoed the resolution again in 1980. The General Assembly passed similar resolutions year after year with the United States and Israel opposed.

read more

http://www.chomsky.info/debates/20051129.htm

Trying to stay alive is one.

Thanking God that the jew sniper missed his shot is another one.

I am sure there are lots of other actions too.

But hey, just you watch those Utube veedeos and you'll see what I mean.

I like answering all questions about peace.

Thomás

just when I thought you couldn't ask any dumber more racist/ignorant questions!

It take two to hate, two to love and two to bring peace. see this website to start see what palestine and israel do for peace,

http://www.ipcri.org/

I took a minute to think about it. Nothing

Absolutely nothing!

Say it again.