Did a plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11?

http://images.google.com/images?um=1&hl=en&q=penta...

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/phot...

http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm

http://911review.org/brad.com/pentagonpictures.htm...

Keep in mind that on 9/11 the pentagon was also having a exercise - drill for their emergency medical team. The drill required them to have all the equipment available and ready for a major disaster within the pentagon.

Plane Hits Pentagon

Why the obvious answer is because a plane didn't hit the Pentagon on 9/11. If you were lucky enough to see the News brief before it was pulled, it would have been obvious that nothing carrying a megaton of fuel rolled across that immaculate lawn and into the Pentagon. There was absolutely nothing disturbed on the lawn and there was a large perfectly round hole in the side of the building but no plane and no fire. As I've said before, if the morons running this madhouse aren't involved in a conspiracy, then they must stop acting like they are. FDR said "nothing in history happens by accident." And George Bernard Shaw wrote that "all great truths begin as blasphemies."

There is strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOtnvXMsWOo

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.

http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.

http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.

http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.

http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.

http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N...

"WITH ALL THE EVIDENCE READILY AVAILABLE AT THE PENTAGON CRASH SITE, ANY UNBIASED RATIONAL INVESTIGATOR COULD ONLY CONCLUDE THAT A BOEING 757 DID NOT FLY INTO THE PENTAGON"...Colonel George Nelson Aircraft accident investigator U.S. Air Force

There is just too much evidence now that suggests an inside job: the fact that ALL THE WRECKAGE WAS SHIPPED ABROAD as soon as possible, the fact that even ROLLS ROYCE themselves have said that the engine recovered at the Pentagon WAS NOT the type of engine used on the type of plane (b757) that was said to be responsible. The fact that some of the 'hijackers' are still alive: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijacker... the fact that no jets were scrambled in time; that no significant plane debris was found at the pentagon site (planes do not vaporize!); that the buildings seem to be demolished, especially building 7; that jet fuel cannot melt steel, even though molten steel was seen "flowing like lava"; that the first responders heard explosions in the basement and within the buildings before they collapsed etc...

-WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein admitted that building 7 was pulled down by a controlled demolition: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk (He changed his story the next day)

-The technology to bring down buildings with thermite and thermate in nano capacity was developed in the 1980's. They liquidized it in the mid 90's so it could be painted on like a gel coating. The twin towers underwent 'maintenance' for a whole year and guys in white hazmats suits 'painted' the core columns.

-Official version claims the towers collapsed due to 'pancake effect', meaning the floors came detached from steel girders and fell on top of each other, collapsing the tower. If that's the case, why weren't any of the (core column) steel girders left standing? http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ub_6RM9p6nY/TjWusVortWI/...

-Pictures show smoke coming from the basement seconds before the plane hits. People (including firefighters and employees) also heard explosions from below the towers, moments before the plane hit. PEOPLE WERE KILLED AND SOME SERIOUSLY INJURED IN THE BASEMENT.

-Pictures show steel girders with diagonal cuts in the them. This is exactly how controlled demolitions bring down buildings: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/wordpress/wp-conte...

-Designers of the WTC say they were built to withstand MULTIPLE impacts from such an aircraft.

-Official version states the plane that hit the pentagon 'vaporised' which is why very little traces can be found. Yet they said they managed to find DNA to identify all of the victims on board. Furthermore the building didn't 'vaporise' in any way. What type of plane vaporises, leaving the building and human DNA relatively undamaged.

-The passport of one of the hijackers in the aircraft was supposedly found in the rubble at the WTC. It's clearly impossible for any personal effects to survive the impact and explosion, therefore it must have been planted.

-All CCTV footage from around the pentagon has been hidden and never released. Why do that if there is nothing to hide?

-86 CCTV cameras show no airplane???

-Released Pentagon Security Camera (FOIA) does not show a 757 and is clearly Missing a frame.

No. The intelligence service suppressed all video footage which could confirm that a plane hit the Pentagon. We must assume therefore that what the government would like us to think hit the Pentagon, did not.

In addition the original hole (before collapse) in the outer wall was nowhere near big enough to match the profile of an airliner.

Lastly, the damage is not consistent with an exploding airliner almost full of fuel and the very high temperatures that would ensue (if you peruse the photos you will see unburned furniture, plastics and even PAPER amongst the debris and on the adjacent walls/floors.

This claim of an airliner impact insults the intelligence and I am surprised that the American people are not outraged.

My boss who is an ex-Marine had one of his good friends, also a Marine, standing guard at the Pentagon when it happened. He heard the explosion, ran around the side of the Pentagon, and saw the scene within a couple minutes. He said there was absolutely no airplane wreckage. He went up to the hole and said there was nothing whatsoever resembling anything like airplane parts inside. It was a missile that hit the Pentagon.

If a plane actually hit the Pentagon, I have only two questions :

1. Why has the government not released the video of the plane crashing into the building ? Neighboring businesses had their security camera footage confiscated by the FBI, yet none was ever released.

2. The Pentagon, if I'm not mistaken, has ground-to-air gun batteries, designed to protect the building. Why did they not ?

:-o

It doesn't appear to be a plane that hit the Pentagon. The government (who we are supposed to control) thus far has refused to release any video to show any real evidence, which I find quite strange.

of courses the plane hit the pentagon, why else would they conjure up 9/11 and blow up the pentagon so that they would be able to restructure the pentagon and funnel all the money into black opt projects without oversights.