The difference between lawyers who work for themselves and those who work in law firms?

It is kind of hard to do a broad based comparison but here are some of the notable distinctions:

(1) Pay

(a) Law Firm- There are all types of law firms ranging from "Big-Law" to "Mid-Law" to "Boutique." Each one of these has their pros and cons. For example, many of the Big-Law firms can pay first-year associates around $160,000 with a bonus ranging from $10,000 to $20,000. The lower you go down in size, usually, the lower the pay gets. The positive thing about "Boutique" firms is that they are usually specialized in a certain practice, i.e., appellate litigation. Some of these Boutiques garner a lot of fame in the legal community.

(b) Sole Practitioner- The pay can very depending on your performance. Some years may be very good and others not. It depends on your case load. Usually sole practitioners work on commission, as a result, they get get a portion of the award. While Big Firms usually charge their clients an hourly rate, which will vary depending on what level of attorney is working on the case, i.e., 1st-year associate versus a 6th-year associate.

(2) Clients

(a) Law firm- Usually the clients are brought in by the attorneys working in the firm. This task is usually delegated to the partners. A rainmaker is a partner that has a significant book of business for the firm. Furthermore, you usually get to deal with the bigger clients, i.e., Microsoft, Bank of America, and etc.

(b) Sole Practitioner- You have to go out there and get your own clients. So, you could get clients through advertisements, referrals, and etc. The clients tend to be "mom & pop" shops.

(3) Resources

(a) Law Firm- Most law firms have more than one practice area. So, it is easy for you to find multiple practice areas in one firm, for example, a firm may have litigation, corporate, securities, and bankruptcy departments. This gives you the flexibility to call upon other attorneys in your law firm to give you advice about a client matter. If you are working on a deal on behalf of a client, and the client then wants to proceed into litigation. You have a litigation department that you can hand the case over to, and they will work on it. Furthermore, law firms usually have a law library and are able to pay for expensive on-line research.

(b) Sole Practitioner- They usually have to learn on the job. Sometimes they will specialize in a particular field, i.e., family law. They also have limited financial resources to pay for these expensive on-line legal research databases.

Probably the best way to look at it is to think of a sole practitioner as owning his/her own business. While a law firm employees attorneys, partners have the opportunity to buy into the firm. Some firms have a two-tier partnership track. Thus some partners will be equity partners and others will be income partners. In this scenario, equity partners have the opportunity to buy into the firm. This allows them to share in the firms profits, which can be in the millions depending on the firm.

Success as a sole practitioner depends upon whether or not one is a good sales person, necessary to obtain clients. It also depends upon luck in getting a great case, to some extent. You must also be able to run a business, something normally not taught in law school. Working for yourself is great if you have the self-discipline required. For the first year, expect not to make more than 20-30k, but this will improve as you obtain more clients.

Both groups work long hours, but more time is generally required for an associate at a firm. Insurance and an I.R.A. are benefits. It can be stressful and difficult to work for a number of "bosses" at a firm, some with unpleasant personalities. The pay at all but the largest U.S. firms can be as low as $40,000 a year.

A lawyer is a generic term for someone with a law degree who practices law - it may be a barrister or solicitor. Barristers and solicitors both have law degrees, however a barrister is more qualified in some ways. In order to become a barrister, after passing the bar exam (which is what all lawyers need to pass in order to be allowed to practice) you need to also complete your articles (which is like an internship) or a year long legal professional preparation course. A solicitor is limited to undertaking paperwork such as conveyancing, wills, trusts etc, whereas a barrister appears in court on behalf of clients. A solictor may appear in court but only in minor matters in front of a Magistrate. Barristers and solicitors will often work together. For instance in a contract case a solicitor may be the initial contact point for the client, collect all the information, prepare a brief and then pass it onto the barrister who will present it in court. The solicitor may assist the barrister in court by helping them prepare the case as well as passing notes etc. So in short, all barristers and solictors are lawyers but not all lawyers are barristers.

An individual working for a well known law firm can become more widely recognized and receive greater compensation. They will be better recognized in their field as well as have access to a larger support structure. A disadvantage would be that you are expected to work on behalf of your firm and have less freedom in your clientele.

An advantage to being an independently employed lawyer is you have freedom in whom you hire, the cases you take on as well as the hours you work.

Technically anyone who has an office has a law firm even if it is only employing one person.

My mother worked in a law firm for a long time before taking a CEO position in a large company and my father is a lawyer who owns his own business. Here are the main differences I know of:

In a law Firm:

-You have someone to account to, the head lawyer, you do not get to choose your cases

-You work long hourse, usually about 50 hours or more a week.

-You make anywhere from $70,000- 100,000 with an average of 5 years experience and maybe 50,000 starting pay (it varies by state).

-You will get the healthcare and benefits provided by your company

Lawyers who work for themselves:

-Can make up to a million a year on a great year. But on average make around 250,000

-Can pick and choose cases and type of law

-Have to work out their own health benefits and plans and taxes which can be complicated on their own

- If you get an average stream of clients you can work over 60 hours a week.

-You get to choose your vacation amount and days

-It can be tough working with just a secretary

Lawyers who work in firms are usually 3 or more senior partners who own and control most of the case assignments and they also provide an envioronment for paralegals to apprientance until they take the bar exams.Firms have a lot of lawyers on the payroll taking a lot of cases making lots of money while self employed lawyers are just themselves and are usually defense lawyers in criminal law not corporate or probate or family law.

The differences are if you have your own firm you have to pay out of pocket for alot of things, but whatever you get paid after a case is yours.

If you work for a firm, your company usually pays for alot of things, but they take a portion of what you earn.

The best thing to do is to start at a firm, then later on create your own firm.

By alot of things I mean, healthcare benefits and stuff like that.

For Legal Advise I visit this website where you can find all the solutions. http://personalfinancesolution.info/index.html?src...

RE :The difference between lawyers who work for themselves and those who work in law firms?

I'd love to know.

Benefits, disadvantages, and preferably, which is the best to succeed?

Follow 13 answers

lawyers who work for themselfs depend on clients using them for their pay and those who work for firms (corporate lawyers ) are on a pay role as firm they represent pays them

Supastar