What is this irrefutable evidence?

If you get the answer to this I would love to hear it. I find no evidence of any kind that indicates evolution is a factual. It is theory and only theory and no scientist has ever been able to provide incontrovertible proof that it is true.

From the way you word your question, you haven't any longer honestly prefer to make certain the info of something. yet what the heck: a million) there's no such think of as a scientific 'regulation' - there are hypotheses and theories. the adaptation is that a concept is an hypothesis that has been examined and not failed the attempt. Theories are constantly below assessment and being examined - if the thought fails a attempt, it incredibly is remodeled until eventually it may embody the hot documents and if it may no longer embody the hot documents, it incredibly is discarded. no person is calling for a lacking hyperlink - the term 'lacking hyperlink' is a fabrication as there's no single hyperlink from all and sundry situation to the different situation. between the fundamentals of technological awareness is falsifiability - can a attempt be designed to make certain no remember if or no longer a concept could be disproven. each time a fossil is stumbled on, there is the potential for disproving the thought of Evolution all it would take is to locate a dinosaur skeleton with an embedded stone gadget or maybe any gadget marks on it. Oddly sufficient , fossilized micro organism has been stumbled on. - so has a poultry no longer being a poultry. mushy bodied (ie organizms w/o a skeletong) are exceedingly annoying to fossilize with the aid of fact they in many situations biodegrade earlier they are able to be mineralized. technological awareness accepts no info as absolute and/or incontrovertable so which you're putting impossible objectives. What technological awareness accepts is that the preponderance of info shows it incredibly is the placement. particularly many times what occurs in technological awareness is that a concept which comprise Newton's concept of gravity isn't disproven yet shown to be a undeniable case of a miles better concept like relativity (which, you could desire to undergo in concepts, is a concept). Quantuum concept comes alongside and is composed of and/provides to previous theories. at present, String concept is between the main widely used theories whether it is been around for extra effective than 30 years and nonetheless has no longer anticipated something new so - as alluring and stylish because it incredibly is - scientists are commencing to look in a various course for solutions.

For a start, it isn't 100% fact, however it can be considered as such in everyday life as it's not far off.

One example of evidence in favour of evolution is the transitional fossil Tiktaalik. It is a fossil with features of both fish and amphibians, and not only does it fit in the fossil record exactly as it should, but it was found by using the fossil record and molecular genetics to predict where it would be- and there it was.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiktaalik

http://tiktaalik.uchicago.edu/meetTik.html

It's not a single piece of evidence, its all of it. Taken together it makes a unified picture. All of genetics supports common descent. Here is a single example of a pattern that cannot be explained by special creation.

Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes, all other apes have 24. If the common ancestor would have had a single number. Parsimony indicates this ancestor had 24.

Since chromosomes cannot just disappear, where did it go? Fusions are rather common. Comparing banding patterns shows that human 2 lines up with two ape chromosomes. Genomic sequencing shows the genes line up as well.

The kicker is human 2 has two centromeres (structure at the center of a chromosome, there is usually one), corresponding to the 2 ape chromosomes. It also has interior telomeres (they are normally only at the ends). Telomeres are directional, and they indicated a fusion, right where the ape chromosomes end.

Human 2 is the result of a fusion event. There is no other reasonable explanation. Such a fusion supports common descent and not special creation.

I can give several hundred other examples.

I agree with you. And fortunately or unfortunately, I also believe in the bible. Put both together and it's quite a conglomeration. But that's what happens when you ask the kinds of questions that you put forth. What is REFUTABLE is your use of the word irrefutable. Is there any proof that the word irrefutable exists. Not. But so what? Who cares? Have a happy new year anyway.

If you were the least bit interested, you could read any science text. Evolution is well established; the evidence is overwhelming and available for all to examine. The fact that you are unaware of this demonstrates profound ignorance. Shame on you.

...everywhere?

Have you seen how closely-related we are to apes? Have you seen how animals all have a lot in common? Have you seen how the fossil record looks? You'd have to keep your eyes shut all the time not to see evolution.

Plus, recently, scientists have proven it with bacteria. You take a culture of bacteria. Bacteria reproduce so fast that we can see thousands of generations in a few years. Inject an antibiotic. As they reproduce, the ones with a beneficial mutation live on. The ones that don't have it, die. Evolution through natural selection. Right there.

Read a middle-school science book.

It is just a theory, there is no evidence to support it, the people that claim 100% proven fact are liars.

Evolution is not 100% proven fact. It's just a theory, hence the THEORY in EVOLUTIONARY THEORY. It just has more evidence then any other theory.

When was god proven to be 100% fact? Where is the evidence?

EDIT: This question is the SAME as yours. If you can't prove god exists then evolution would be unquestionable and vice versa.