Proof! Proof...and more proof?

Yeah plenty.

Here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_jesus

http://books.google.com/books?id=0CKrintnpbMC&prin...

Jesus is not subject to proof or disproof and, he can't be.

He raised a man from the dead who was dead 4 days, while Jesus was here on earth. We did not live back then but, back then people that did see that it really happened, some believed and some did not.

If you saw it happen today you would have to decide whether or not you believed it because proof, can be seen by some and they believe and the same proof can be seen by others and they don't get it.

Sorry if you was hoping for something that would make you believe.

Mistake proof

I have proof that there is a liberal agenda to promote evolution.

Despite the excited and optimistic claims that have been made by some Paleontologists NO fossil hominid (human ancestor) species can be established as our direct ancestor.

Richard B. Lewontin 1987

Human Diversity Pg. 163

-----------------------------------------------

Why does the NEA (National Education Association) teach evolution when there is no proof of it?

I believe it is done for political advantage.

Could it be that the NEA (a beneficiary of Democratic Unionized money from earmarks of the Democrats) want to keep religion stalled because they want to keep Democrats in power and squash the Religious Republicans?

A. Australopithicus afarnsis the famous skeleton known as Lucy had wrists capable of locking the hands in place during knuckle walking

Lucy on the Ground With Knuckles

Science News Apr. 8 2000 p 235

Yet many of the Museums (bought with Democratic earmarks) and classroom textbooks (written by Democratic Union writers) often misrepresent and fictionalizes along with using artist renderings that editorialize a position of evolution over creation STRICTLY to DISCREDIT a God creator.

For Instance in the St. Louis Mo. Zoo, they show a manufactured model of "Lucy" with an inaccurate portrayal of a human form. Everything is all wrong on the model, yet it leaves the visitor quite convinced we came from apes.

Although, Lucy was found with 40 per cent of her fossil bones and she was missing hands and feet, The Model shows human hands and feet with straight Phalengenes (fingers) . Subsequently, bones have been found that prove Lucy had Chimpanzee (curved bones)

Stern & Sussman

Journal of Physical Antropology 1983

Page 279-317 P. 284

A Summary of the morphologic and functional affinities of the Hador hand fossils lead inexorably to an image of suspensory adapted hand, surprisingly similar to hands found in small end of the pygmy chimpanzee, the common chimpanzee range.

also:

Richmond & Strait

Nature Magazine - March 23

Foot misrepresentation

Curious people never get converted. But I will comply.

The popular historian Will Durant, himself not a Christian, wrote concerning Christ's historical validity, "The denial of that existence seems never to have occurred even to the bitterest gentile or Jewish opponents of nascent Christianity" (Durant, The Story of Civilization, vol. 3, p. 555). And again, "That a few simple men should in one generation have invented so powerful and appealing a personality, so lofty an ethic and so inspiring a vision of human brotherhood, would be a miracle far more incredible than any recorded in the Gospels" (Ibid., p. 557).

Spiritual proof.

Flat out Zero on this one

.

No body can show in hands evidence that the man named Jesus Christ the called Son of God

.

Ever was even born and lived

.

Not even a thread of evidence is available

No real proof, but in my opinion there must have been an actual person that the movement grew up around.

This question is asked so frequently on here its incredible.

The answer is no, they cant without using the Bible, which is basically like trying to use a Sesame Street book to prove the existence of Big Bird.

The educated think so:

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/j...