Will some people still be in denial when World War 3 breaks out due to climate change?

Yes.

Some few people... staring over the dry barren plain... screaming at the scorching wind... and their only thought will be "Why has my God forsaken me?"

If anyone thinks that governments and resourceful corporations and individuals aren't already preparing for the inevitable... don't kid yourself. It's the unspoken truth.

Undoubtedly more foreign aid programs will not stop the weather. But it could deter a war. He--l pay anyone enough, they will stop whatever it is that you want. I can't help wondering about modern countries much less the poorer nations. To be realistic pushing all the chips onto the table. America has been dealing with and still is with (mass migration) issues. Asian countries have large floating migratory pools that follow the jobs. India has the same problems, but at least they try to create stability through education.

So yes they can have my extra 13 dollars a week. Maybe they will learn to build a dam or invest it in agri biotechnology program for disease resistant grains.

WW3 does no longer be a conflict, noone might combat by using fact of each and every of the Nuclear conflict... all people might only bomb the s*** out of another, So WW3 might never start up. meant we didnt have Nukes i might in all threat be compelled into the army the place i may be a medic.

I doubt that there will actually be a world war due to global warming (cities underwater, yes; people starving, possibly; localised wars, probably a few). There's just too much at risk for the big powers to get too involved in any of the wars (and the possibility of escalation will prevent them from going at each other directly, instead the wars fought will probably be proxy wars and funding of terrorism instead of WWIII).

Some of the problems caused by global warming could be mitigated by providing improved technology so that might avoid a lot of wars (and probably be cheaper than war, enough so that only idiots would actually fight and they'd probably fight anyway).

EDIT: In terms of water, desalination could be used if needed (a carbon neutral source of energy for the process would be a good idea though), landlocked countries would be able to buy water from countries that have access to the ocean for desalination (or receive it as tribute, err, I mean foreign aid).

The question is not when, but if. And even though Stern feels world war 3 is imminent it remains far from reality.

Should the idea of global warming ever become something more than a weak, groundless theory we will deal with it, but not because a staunch Brit with an attitude tells us to.

His audience Saturday, small and elite, had been stranded here by bad weather and were talking climate. They couldn't do much about the one, but the other was squarely in their hands. And so, Lord Nicholas Stern was telling them, was the potential for mass migrations setting off mass conflict.

This statement pretty much sums up the real gist of the article. The elite were stranded for a day and that is a real problem for them after all they are above the rest us.

Of all the believers J.S. I have respected your opinion, this article is not up to your standards and quite frankly I am disappointed.

World War Three may or may not break out, but it will have nothing to do with the weather.

Fear is a timeless tool used by politicians to further an agenda. In this case the agenda is global socialism.

Scientists who disagree with the UN's IPCC must be in denial too.

Yea - This idea ranks right up there with the 'Domino Theory'.

It sounds plausible, scares enough people and in the end, just more mindless political ranting.

Will some people will still be in denial if we get 20 years of cooling?