Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
How was people with tuberculosis treated?
Were they avoided? or Killed? How did other people treat the ones with tuberculosis?
i need to know how peole reacted to the people with TB. I know they were quarantined and avoided by others but what else did people do to them. Did someone kill one of them on purpose or what?
2 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
There were Sanitariums for TB patients.
These were located in areas away from cities, sometimes in the country.
Patients were REQUIRED to be quarantined and or reside there for about a year or so.
Rest and diet were the treatments.
Many were cured if they were not too far advanced.
Source(s): My late mother-in-law spent a year there. She was cured. All who had contact with her were required to be tested. - ?Lv 44 years ago
a great number of rights, 1st modification rights and many different rights, are suspended for the time of wars. this is one reason wars are to be prevented, for use in straightforward terms as a final motel. almost each president has been accused of going previous his constitutional powers, and Lincoln probably maximum of all, however the consensus on the instant is that he became justified under the circumstances. this is humorous how human beings (Republicans in general) element out that GW Bush became no longer the 1st president to droop habeas corpus. confident, Lincoln suspended habeas corpus, yet in straightforward terms very temporarily, and then the recommendations-blowing courtroom reversed him. Bush suspended habeas corpus in a much less extreme and desperate concern, and all human beings interior the country went "Hmmm. properly, ok i assume." yet in our time even the conflict on drugs has fee us rights. The conflict on drugs allowed police to end somebody on the line and question him with out probably reason, to interrupt down doors for the 1st time in our background, to wiretap and seek with out warrants, etc. i think of the actual purpose of the conflict on drugs had no longer something to do with drugs, it became all approximately eroding our constitutional rights. The conflict on Terror is in simple terms the subsequent step.