Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Are you more ANTI-formula OR PRO-breastfeeding?
I was asked the other day if I was more PRO-breastfeeding or ANTI-formula. Now most of you would immediately say that they are one in the same, but I had to think about the question before I responded. Which was I?
I am more ANTI-formula than I am PRO-breastfeeding. Granted, formula - a dead substance - has for many years has sustained life, but breastMILK - a LIVING substance - has sustained optimum life since the dawn of time and the first mother put her baby to her breast.
For ME it comes down to the breastMILK. It was designed for babies by their mothers and it shouldn't matter if the breastMILK is fed to the baby at the breast or via a bottle.
**So what are you? More anti-formula or pro-breastfeeding?**
The following reasons came to mind rather quickly as to why *I* am more anti-formula:
--Formula is inadequate. There are an estimated 300 some odd nutritious properties/ingredients in Breastmilk. Breastmilk is the STANDARD for optimal infant and toddler nutrition. Formula has about 40 some odd ingredients in it. That is approximately 13% of the ingredients that are in breastmilk.
--NO antibodies in formula. Formula is not only nutritionally lacking in comparison to the breastmilk standard, it is immunologically lacking as well. Formula cannot mimic the maternal antibodies that are passed from mother to baby to help protect the baby's new and immature immune system. The human breast customizes antibodies in the milk for the baby to fight whatever pathogen - virus/bacteria/germs- the infant is exposed to its environment.
--The ingredients are all synthetic. The ingredients are not made by human body nor are they naturally occuring ingredients from human milk. The base for most formulas is cows milk - a common allergen for MANY babies. The protiens and fats are also LARGER than the ones found in breastmilk - this makes formula harder to digest and it takes longer too. Lactose free formulas - most common is SOY - is inappropriate as well because the protiens and fats are derived from the soybean - a vegetable/legume - and they are not made to be easily digested by infants either. Soy is now becoming a growing allergen in babies and children, too.
--Contributes to unhealthy weight gains. Cows milk protiens and fats are designed to feed a baby COW that starts out around 80-100 pounds and is supposed to triple its birthweight the first couple of weeks. And we wonder why there are so many overweight children and adults? It all begins at the bottle of formula (and then compounds the problem with the over processed foods we eat).
--Increased risk of Diabetes. By contributing to unhealthy weight gains, formula is putting each child at an increased risk of Type 2 Diabetes - either as a child/teen or as an adult. The formula teaches our bodies the wrong way to break down food particles and leads to problems later in life.
--Unsterile manufacturing. If you think that formula is made in clean, germ free white rooms where the employees are dressed in sterile clothing and use the strictest policies to maintain germ-free environments - you are sadly mistaken. The formula is manufactured just like any other product - with the most cost effective method of production - which is always the least ideal and sanitary way.
--Recalls/contaminations. Because of the methods of productions and the fact that there is such thing as human error, formulas can be recalled for many reasons. Either there is something hazardous that could be in the lot of formula, or they miscalculated the amounts for the ingredients. SInce the dawn of mass formula production there have been 22-25 SIGNIFICANT recalls of formula for potentially life-threatening situations. Ingredients were either deficient or superpotent that could cause harm to the babies or they had foreign particles/bacteria in them like glass or salmonella. Breastmilk is ALWAYS made in sterile production conditions and can NEVER be recalled.
--Undermines mothers' abilities. Samples of formula are often given in the hospital or even mailled to a pregnant mother who registers for a baby item or magazine. They come with information on breastfeeding but implies that the mother's milk might be inadequate or the mother might not make enough of her own milk, that there are alternatives. This sets any new mom up for disaster! Before her baby is even here, she is doubting herself and her body's ability to nourish her baby. She will be more worried about what the formula company said *might* happen that she forgets to relax and have faith in herself and her body. Next thing the mother knows, she is having all those problems she feared and the formula company's information on breastfeeding was what started it.
--->Breast MILK is the key. We all have heard the slogans *Breast is Best,* *Human Milk for Human Babies,* and *Babies Were Born to Breastfeed* and all that is well and good. However, many mothers find that feedi
This is NOT intended as a debate.
I know a person can be Pro-breastfeeding and neutral on formula for their own reasons.
I know a person can be against formula and neutral on breastfeeding - maybe they don't like the process in which mass formula is made and therefore use special homemade versions.
Best answer goes to the one who can share their feelings as to why they are more one or the other - whether its the same as mine or not.
6 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
I'm pro breastfeeding and pro formula feeding, I do both. I've never heard of having to be anti formula just because you make a choice to breast feed, I don't see formula feeding Mom's asking this question in regards to breast milk ever. I think that any amount of breast milk is beneficial for babies, however it's not always realistic and not always an option. I wasn't able to feed my son breast milk only, I had to supplement with formula. So sure as nice as it is to breast feed, it's not always possible. I think that as long as a baby is eating, getting the proper nutrition, how ever Mom and baby feel most comfortable is best.
- 1 decade ago
I am more pro breastfeeding because I don't know too much about formula. I do know how good breastfeeding is for the baby and mommy. I am interested in what others have to say but I don't thing it showed up on the board.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I am both. But I am also anti-bottle (I am difficult to please haha) - I don't see the point in expressing breastmilk into bottles (unless away from the baby of course) when you could feed directly. Something that really bugs me is seeing newborns with bottles propped onto something in their pram because their parents are too busy shopping, or whatever, to stop and feed them. Sorry for digressing :o)
- Milk MaidLv 41 decade ago
I feel like I am very pro breastfeeding and anti-formula, at least for my baby.
I believe they should not hand out those samples of formula. It is a free advertisement from formula companies and then women who want to breastfeed have formula in their reach. They feed the formula and it decreases their confidence in their ability to feed their baby.
Also, as you said, formula is inadequate. Medical professionals should go by the biological norm when making comparisons. Breast is best is inverted language. It should be Breast is normal and Formula is inferior.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 decade ago
I'm pro whatever a woman decides is best for her body and family.