Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why is it so difficult to find a cure for cancer?

10 Answers

Relevance
  • lo_mcg
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Because the trouble with finding 'a cure for cancer' is that cancer is hundreds of diseases, not just one. The difficulty is that different cancers are caused by different things, so no one strategy can prevent them, and different cancers respond to different treatments so no one treatment can cure them all. There will never be a magic bullet that cures all cancer.

    And some cancers CAN be cured these days:. 7 out of 10 children are cured of cancer. Testicular cancer, Hodgkin's disease, and many cases of leukaemia can all be cured in adults with chemotherapy, most skin cancers are cured with surgery, and many cases of thyroid cancer and cancer of the larynx are cured with radiotherapy.

    Many other types of cancer are also cured if they are found early enough. There is still a long way to go, especially with some of the commonest types of cancer such as lung, breast, bowel and prostate cancer. But there is dedicated (and underfunded) work going on; there'll never be a Eureka! moment when a single substance or procedure is found that will reverse all types of cancer. But there will continue to be steady progress - a new treatment for one type of cancer discovered, perhaps a way to reverse or slow down another type.

    The idea that a 'cure' exists and is kept hidden for reasons of profit is nonsense. These cancer cure conspiracy theories are an urban myth, a sort of game played by those who have not had cancer or close experience of it.

    If there were such a conspiracy drug companies would be keeping quiet about the cure even though it would bring them fame and fortune. Any drug company discovering a cure would make far more money than they can have dreamed of making up till now.

    And doctors, scientists, researchers etc would be watching their relatives die and dying themselves (they and their families develop cancer at the same rate as the rest of the population) rather than revealing the existing secret cure

    And in order to prove that any secret, hidden cure worked, thousands of people would have to have been cured by it. They’d all be keeping quiet too – not a word to the media from any of them either.

    Most unlikely of all, every medical professional in the whole world would have agreed to keep existence of a cure secret. Every single one. One blabbermouth, one disgruntled researcher or sacked nurse and the whole conspiracy’s blown. Newspapers and other media wouldn't have got a sniff of it.

    I live in the UK; we don't pay for our medical treatment, including cancer treatment. Cancer treatment costs our government many, many billions. If there were a cure for cancer that would save them this money, believe me that's what we'd be getting.

    We have the same treatments as in the US. Why? Because although existing treatments aren't perfect - very far from it - they are all we have at the moment, and we know, because they have been tested and proven in double-blind clinical trials, that they save many lives and prolong many, many more.

    And our doctors are salaried; they wouldn't make an extra penny if the cancer rates doubled tomorrow, or lose money if the cancer rate dropped by half tomorrow.

  • 1 decade ago

    Because all cancers are not the same. Even breast cancers have many types, and many different causes (which is the mutation that finally affects the function of the cell enough so that it becomes cancerous?). It's not a virus, or bacteria - it's our own body's cells growing out of control. How do you keep that in check? How can they monitor every single cell? How do you kill off part of your own body without destroying the rest?

    There will never be one treatment that will cure every type of cancer because of that. They may find a cure for cancer x or cancer y, but it won't work for everything. As some of the others are saying, there will be many cures, when they eventually find them.

  • 5 years ago

    Hypothyroidism, or low thyroid function, is a silent epidemic, according to many functional medicine doctors. How to cure hypothyroidism naturally https://tr.im/tqSqG

    People can suffer for years with symptoms that our conventional medical system frequently doesn’t know how to treat because complaints seem scattered or vague and often there is no pill for the ill(s).

    What’s worse, in most cases, hypothyroidism isn’t rooted in a thyroid problem in the first place. It’s rooted in an immune system gone awry, but most doctors don’t test for the antibodies that show the presence of autoimmunity.

  • judy
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Curing maximum cancers demands killing or removing each and every residing maximum cancers cellular interior the physique, and in many circumstances it incredibly is totally complicated to hint down each and every maximum cancers cellular. If any cells are left, the main cancers might return. previous due-point maximum cancers is composed of maximum cancers spreading to all factors of the physique. whilst that occurs, it incredibly is extraordinarily stressful to hint all of it down and kill it. it incredibly is why previous due-point maximum cancers finally has a tendency to be deadly. some cancers are consumer-friendly to handle, nevertheless. epidermis maximum cancers is the main uncomplicated form of maximum cancers, and it incredibly is incredibly consumer-friendly to treatment. The cancerous epidermis is bumped off, and the sickness is cured. A epidermis-maximum cancers sufferer is not any plenty greater probable to die than somebody with the flu (as long because it incredibly is not any longer cancer). The treatment fee for epidermis maximum cancers is so severe that it incredibly is often ignored of documents, because of fact it has a tendency to skew the numbers. often, any maximum cancers it incredibly is extremely localized might nicely be cured via surgically removing it. much less encapsulated cancers can each and every so often be cured via treatments that attain many factors of the physique and kill the main cancers cells they bump into. yet some cancers are the two diffuse and complicated to kill, and are as a effect very complicated to handle. Early therapy facilitates plenty, yet some cancers produce no indications till they are too a techniques long previous to treatment (lung maximum cancers is often like this).

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It is not. There isn't just one--but there are many cures for cancer.

    My dad had prostate cancer and he never had any radiation or chemo. He ate bitter almonds and did a total body cleanse. Now he is cancer-free.

    Max Gerson wrote a book about fifty cases of patients that were sent home to die from from cancer. Dr. Max Gerson treated all of these patients and all of them survived cancer after being sent home to die. The Gerson Institute now exists and treats cancer victims in Mexico. The Gerson Institute is advocated by Prince Charles.

    Max Gerson is also famous for curing Noble Prize winner Albert Schwitzer of Adult onset diabetes...I am trying the treatment now to cure my own diabetes (with phenomenal results)!

    Pharma companies make BILLIONS off of diabetics and cancer patients. Can you imagine how devestating it would be for them for all these victims to be instantly cured with out their drugs??? That is the reason YOU don't know that there is a cure. But THERE IS A CURE. There are many cures, in fact.

    lo_mcg: I'm not keeping quiet BTW. But clearly you just choose to ignore it. Many mainstream cancer treatments are experimental and are as effective as sugar pill!!

    Source(s): The Beautiful Truth (DVD) My own tragic experiences
  • 1 decade ago

    Also too many people would be out of jobs, like researchers and doctors and the pharmacutical companies who make all the drugs. It would make sense to me to figure out a cure for cancer then move on to something else like MS and CF and stuff like that.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I agree with the making money aspect.

    During my treatment each chemo was 1900.00 for about a 1/2 pint of the drug and my radiation was 2100.00 a treatment for 37 treatments. 2 surgeries and several MRI/CAT scans

    Do the math, how many cases overall are treated in the US alone each year.

    For me, I lost my home, car and my retirement along with what Blue Shield paid.

    Somebody profited from my illness at Bernie Maddof med center!!

    Source(s): 20 month survivor of anal cnacer
  • 1 decade ago

    Haven't you already heard. There is a cure for all cancers. They just don't give it to people because if they did then there would be no need for the doctors anymore. It is all about the money the doctors would loose if they gave the cure to everyone!

  • 1 decade ago

    honey i believe there is.they don't want to let it out then they lose money on kemo.tests.medicine, all kinds of things,they get money to make this cure and who really know whats going on..if they don't have one it is a shame,i have lost some loved ones in my life with cancer.

  • 1 decade ago

    Problem is the varying types and diagnosis on many are difficult . Because of lack of symptoms.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.