Bill O'Reilly VS Michael Savage?

If I had to pick one, I would pick O'Reilly. Savage is way too over the top and rants too much for my tastes. I've listened to him a few times and the few times he actually took callers, I don't think I ever heard him let one complete a thought before jumping off into a 5-10 minute rant and hanging up on them.

Well first of all, Mike Savage blasts O'Reilly a lot and O'Reilly doesn't much care. I like both. Savage goes over the top a lot of times though. O'Reilly rarely does. Savage gets on O'Reilly when he feels he didn't stand up for something when he thought he should have. But I think O'Reilly gets to the bottom of things and speaks up for important issues. So it would be tough because i do often agree with Savage but not always his methods. I guess i could say that O'Reilly is more practical. I would probably agree with them both but if i had to take a side i'd take O'Reilly.

I watch O'Reilly almost every night and listen to Savage almost every day. If I had to choose one and drop the other, I would stick with Savage. My problem with that is O'Reilly has gorgeous women (Martha McCallum et al) and Savage does not.

Michael Savage.

O'Reilly is too liberal for me

I can't say I agree with either of them most of the time. But Mr Weiner strikes me as much more of a blowhard, and Mr O'Reilly seems more consistent and reasonable. My take, for what it's worth.

Who the hell is Michael Savage? His name has been all over here lately and I've never heard of the guy.

Blowhard vs Anarchist

Radio shock jocks that sensationalize the news and give their opinion (doesn't mean their opinions are right or even correct). They get paid an immense amount of money for ratings... Actually I listen to both and pay attention to neither. They are entertainers.

Bill O'Reilly might just cut his mic, wuss.