Is Nancy Pelosi more responsable for this econemy then Obama?

Yes, for several reasons, mostly because she has been the leader of the house for 2 1/2 years and prior to his election as President, Barry was just a single senator of absolutely no distinction or activity. He was a political non-entity that only won his seat through political shenanigans like the democrats used to blame on Nixon.

I blame Bush for not vetoing ridiculous legislative pork bills and the previous members of Congress for passing the pork bills.

I blame Obama and the members of Congress for introducing stalinistic policies into the US in an unconstitutional manner. It is against the USC for the US Government to take away people's income just because the Congress didnt have the desire to read a bill.

Article 1, Section 9, clause 3: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

whale

Donovan, perhaps you should not call someone stupid until you have checked what has just come out of your own mouth?

Pelosi and the Democrats have been in charge of BOTH the House and Senate since the 2006 elections, so IN FACT, the Democrats have been in CONTROL during the beginning and middle of this recession.

If Fox and communicate radio began broadcasting the comparable way by means of fact the super apple situations, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS or PBS and NPR, their rankings could circulate the comparable way, so till they reversed polarity too, no you may pay attention to Obama, Pelosi and Reid, the liberals are caught with them now as an elementary remember of skill, style of like a foul hangover, democrats are wishing they awakened in mattress with somebody else. the two events have been giving us applicants for a protracted time that we are in a position to only shrug and say "the lesser of two evils" as quickly as we vote, the only element easily shared via the politicians in Washington is tehy all concern term limits or regular, extensive-unfold human beings filling elected place of work. Elitists like Susan Esterich propose this can be the top of the international, yet we are in a position to work out the place the expert, occupation politicians have taken us, and that includes regulation professors who think of they're too substantial to pay their parking tickets. you may desire to seize human beings off the line at random, clarify how lots funds we owe, how lots we are in a position to borrow or print, and how lots we are in a position to spend, and that i guess they could do a extra efficient interest fixing an austerity funds we could proceed to exist on, only as ordainary all of us is compelled to do on a daily basis of their lives.

ABSOLUTELY!

As I have been saying the economy got bad 2 1/2 years ago when the democrats took the house.

I am kidding my self? Okay, I better switch the channel to Fox news.

Honestly, your stupidity is undeniable. The recession happened under Bush's watch, not Obama's. Throw money at the problem? Bush threw money at Iraq. Did we help fight off terrorists? No. The Taliban is stronger than ever in Afghanistan. You need to know what you are throwing money at.

Democrats never ran the country during the recession, until now. But it takes a little more than 2 seconds to clean up an entire Recession. Sorry for the "inconvenience"

And ever since 9/11, we were never in "prosperity." Can you tell the difference between the dreams you have at night and reality? Gas prices were HIGH in 2002. And thousands of troops were being deployed to Iraq, and we were scared shitless because of 9/11. Call that prosperity if you know what hell looks like. =/

How could Obama be more responsible ? After all Mr Obama only spent 143 actual days as a US Senator before taking his throne so how can you even suggest he was at fault for anything ? Course in those brief 143 days he did manage to be voted into the top ten list of worst wasteful spenders in Washington. Quite an accomplishment when you think about it.

San Fran Nan take some responsibility?

She's more present than Barry is.

Libs will say "it took Bush 8 years to ruin the country" yet under Bush's first 6 years, we were in prosperity.

It wasn't until congress went Democrat in 2006, that things went downhill..

No. You guys in the minority are soooo cute when you try to redirect the problems with the ecomomy on the Dems without taking any blame for the Bush years. There is a good reason you are in the minority, America woke up & voted you guys out. Plain & simple.

maybe he will spend another 5 trillion to bail out his other spending....I'm sure Nancy Pelosi is already thinking about it.......if spending more than Bush doesn't work then just spend even more...what a joke........even Bush knew it was the government spending that was truly causing the problem

Of course not. She's a total buffoon, but Obama has to take total responsibility for the mess he is creating!