Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What car is better??? and tell me why.?
what car do you think is better a 2009 Bugatti Veyron spider or a 2009 Lamborghini gallardo. with the Veyron going around 1000 mph and the lambo. going around 500 mph
7 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
thats a tough one. the veyron is alot faster, but i personally love the lambo, the look of it, and the way it sounds. So i would probably go with the lambo anyway. i dont think you need to go 1000 mph anyway. lol
- bracken46Lv 51 decade ago
For crying out loud, no one on here knows. They've probably NEVER seen a Veyron in person, let alone driven one AND a Lambo for a comparison test. I don't think they make the Veyron in spider trim.
You're comparing apples to oranges anyways...the Gallardo and the Veyron aren't even in the same class.
I'd watch Top Gear and get an opinion from people who have an actual experience and knowledge base to draw from!
And it's "hp", not "mph", by the way. 1000 mph is breaking the sound barrier, the territory of military fighter jets and the SR-71, NOT an automobile.
- 1 decade ago
First of all a Bugatti Veyron does 253-254 mph, and depending on which gallardo, 202mph at the most. The Bugatti also has Faster acceleration, but costs almost 2 million dollars, while the Lambo costs between $150,000 and $300,000, plus the Gallardo is more practical, Bugatti is nice, But id say the Lambo
- Murcie_LP640Lv 71 decade ago
*sigh* I'm going to be here a while...
OK, first off, the Bugatti Veyron has not been made as a spider/convertible. Second of all, if you're comparing these cars I'm pretty sure you can't actually afford either of them. Mainly because you're comparing 2 million bucks to 300,000 bucks. Third, its horsepower, not miles per hour. Fourth, this time to Mad Jack, the SSC is one of the worst supercars you could possibly buy, simply because they have skimped on a lot, and I mean A LOT, of features that make it a death dealing car for everyday driving. Typical American response for suggesting that car though. Even though it's a piece of crap that doesn't even have ABS brakes. Besides that, buy a Gallardo and a twin-turbo system for it and it'll be quicker than the SSC anyway.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Mad JackLv 71 decade ago
The Shelby Supercars Ultimate Aero beats both of them.
Guinness World Records verified that Shelby SuperCars’ (SSC) Ultimate Aero is officially the "Fastest Production Car" in the world. This record was set 10/09/2007.
Clocking 414.31 kph (257.44 mph) on the first pass and 410.24 kph (254.91 mph) on the second pass to yield an official record speed of 412.28 kph (256.18 mph).
What I think is impressive about this is that it was not set on a special race track, but on a closed section of public highway.
With 1183 bhp and 1094 ft-lbs of torque, the Ultimate Aero produces more emissions-legal horsepower than any other production automobile in the world (another Guinness World Record for which SSC is currently applying).
The Bugatti Veyron Spider only goes 253 MPH
The Lamborghini Gallardo only only goes about 203 MPH. It couldn't even keep up with the much cheaper Chevrolet Corvette ZR1
- C7SLv 71 decade ago
Veryon reaches 253mph with around 1000HP.
Gallardo reaches 195mph with around 500HP.
Both cars are AWD and luxurious.
I would go for the Lamborghini.
It is 7.5 times cheaper, more fun to drive and easier to park and live with and better looking and still a fast car.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Why bother with such nonsense? Buy a Yaris cp.