Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Mikey O's asked in SportsBasketball · 1 decade ago

The real reason Lakers want Artest and are letting go of Ariza?

Not because of the money, not because of the "friendships", but because he's the only person who can guard Lebron 1-on-1.

Agree or no?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    What up Don't need Baron,

    Ron Artest is a great one-on-one defender-- but the Lakers did not get him just to guard LeBron James. Artest gives the Lakers something that they were missing even during their championship run last year- which is: toughness.

    It is an added luxury to have a one-on-one defender and if the Lakers can also re-sign Shannon Brown along with Kobe- they have three very ahletic solid one-on-one defenders.

    It doesn't hurt that Artest is good friends with Kobe and Lamar (but honestly neither of them were out recruiting him like LeBron was). i think Artest had two choices: get paid, or take the mid-level and go to a championship contender. i think Ron regrets not signing with the Lakers two years ago when he had the chance and ended up getting traded from Sacramento to Houston. The situation just kind of worked itself out (almost like the D. Fish situation) because of the injury to Yao and to be able to get a player of Ron's caliber for the mid-level exception is great!

    i think it counteracts some of the other moves that teams have made in the off-season:

    San Antonio getting Richard Jefferson.

    The Celtics possibly getting Rasheed Wallace.

    The Cavs getting Shaq and possibly another small forward.

    And Orlando got Vince Carter (although are also losing Hedu) which is actually a step backwards.

    Nickster

  • Keith
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    You may have a point there.

    Artest signed for 6 million a year, 18 total for 3 years. The mid-level exception is around 5.3 - 5.6 million but the Lakers weren't going to pay any more than that.

    So if money was the reason, they would have kept Ariza. But they didn't.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Good point, but I thought that Kobe was the last person Artest wanted to play with, but if it gets him a ring who cares

  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    I don't understand why the Lakers would let Ariza go.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • PAVY-7
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    ariza is overrated his good but no one heard of this guy until he made some plays in a few games in the nba finals and western conference finals

  • 1 decade ago

    Thats a really good point.

  • It
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Kobe can guard him to.

  • 1 decade ago

    You know I begining to think you are right.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Wow, I think you're right.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.