DO YOU THINK DEBBIE ROWE?

I think she should get them since shes the mother. They will need much therapy since their father was a freak. As for blanket, thats a million dollar therapy session. Wow that guy was messed up. I feel for the kids.

I read in an article that the children (eldest two) are not biologically hers....that she was a surrogate for the babies who were conceived in vitro with another woman's egg and the sperm of Michael Jackson's dermatologist (for whom she worked, I believe). Then, I read another article which said that she is willing to undergo DNA testing to prove otherwise.

Regardless, she willingly cut all ties to the children (and was paid quite handsomely).

I suppose I'd have to read/learn more about the situation, since there are many conflicting reports in the media. However, based on what I have to go on...no, I do not believe she should get custody of those children. I believe she has an agenda for seeking custody ($$$). I never liked her nor trusted her.

On the other hand, Katherine Jackson is rather old. She most likely won't live much longer. Where does that leave those poor kids who just lost the only parent they've ever known? Then, they're going to be shuffled to Diana Ross???

I think Michael should have given them to Janet.

No I don't think Debbie Rowe should get custody of the two children she and Michael had.

I think Debbie Rowe is the biological mother. Michael, however, was not the biological father. Being a man-child, I just don't think he would have ever had sex with anyone because he would have considered it dirty and inappropriate. It is this mind set that he and Elvis Presley had. Elvis did not have sex with Priscilla again once she got pregnant. He felt it was unclean.

The surrogate child, Blanket, is not Michael's either. He was conceived from donor sperm and and egg.

I really do not understand what difference it makes. Michael is the only true parent those children ever knew and that made him their dad. Anyone can father a child, but it takes an extraordinary person to be a true parent and that he was beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Paris looks like Debbie Rowe. I think both Paris and Michael Jr. were born of Debbie Rowe by a sperm donor and purchased by Michael Jackson to be his children. In reading all news articles you get that impression because they refer only to "Blanket" as his biological child. Just because Debbie Rowe sold out at once doesn't mean she doesn't have feelings for her children, and her gut may be telling her its time to step in. I, personally, cannot imagine how she must be feeling. I don't think her intention is for money or to rip them from the Jackson family completely, but she feels compelled to step in. I think both children should be introduced to her and allowed to get aquainted with her over time and let them decide if they want to live with her or the Jacksons; they are at that age where they can decide that; if the Jacksons don't allow this it will leave a "bad taste in my mouth"....

I feel that Ms Rowe should get custody of her children, she has spent too much time with those farm animals and her 7/8million bucks I reckon she would make a damned good mother given the chance. Micheal is DEAD and GONE the deal that they made is OBSOLETE.

the first 2 are debbie rowes children but not micheal, lisa maria presley said he confided in her and said that one father is NBA star. Other father is NFL star.The third is micheal Jacksom son but the mother is unknown

Debbie cow lookin behind dont even want the poor kids. Janet or rebbie should have the kids they are sweet. Latoya and Joe shouldnt even be near the kids. Oh and the 2 oldest arnt Mj's obivously! But he cared for them..so does it matter?

katherine jackson should get the custody as she has displayed a wish to have them as debbie rowe is wishy washy and has stated that she actually wouldn't want to have custody of them. I actually believe that the kid's were michael's but we'll never know unless there is dna testing which i believe should be done to make certain as there is much evidence that point out that he and debbie rowe both are not the biological parents.

answer mine!!

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Als8c...

No, 1st of all for any mother to leave the kids for money means she's unfit anyway. They have no real relationship w/ her and should go to someone w/ an establish relationship. I feel sorry for the children.

i think she should be the one taking care of them but from what i heard she didn't want custody

also, i dont think i can accurately judge weather or not they're theirs cuz obviously the answer cud b anything, i dont know

but in my opinion i think paris and prince (the oldest one i think) are definitely debbie's i mean they have the same face.

no she gave up custody to the kids so she shouldnt get them

every1 knos they werent biologically his however they were hers. it dont take a genius to figure that ut hes black so if they were his theyd b blck not white. they had a sperm donor

blanket was from a surrogate

paris and prince were debbie rowes however SHE GAVE UP THE RIGHTS TO HER KIDS SO SHE SHOULDNT GET CUSTODY

HIS MOTHER SHOULD GET CUSTODY HE STATED THATS WHAT HE WANTED IN HIS WILL AND U SOULD RESPECT A DEAD MANS WISHES

peace out v