Which player in which scenario is better? (read more for details)?

By Far....MJ playing on the lakers teams is the best....

If you put MJ with shaq & kobe, that would have been the best trio in history, if you put MJ, Kobe, Artest,Gasol, Odom, Bynum, Fish, and their bench together, they are great too....

If you analyze the bulls 'star 'players that were key to their championship runs, you include Pippen, Rodman, and maybe toni kukoc.....

Look at the lakers star players, both with shaq and post shaq:

*shaq /*Gasol /*Artest/ *Odom /* with a more athletic depth at bench too...

If MJ was able to lead his team to a 72-10 record with Pippen and Rodman, Imagine what he could do with Gasol, Bynum, Odom, Artest, and Fisher. They would probably win about 75 games.

Kobe on the 90's bulls team would be really different. The bulls wouldn't have had 6 rings, thats for sure. They probably would have had around 2.

The first 3 the lakers won with Shaq and Kobe, it was pretty much all Shaq in the Finals. If MJ was on that team, it would have been a whole lot of Jordan and Shaq as his sidekick. They would have bested together.

If Jordan played in the 2000's with the lakers teams, he would have won about 7-8 rings. Kobe would have won maybe 2 in the 90's with the bulls teams.

Jordan made the bulls. If MJ was never on the Bulls, we probably wouldn't have ever won a ring. Every role player on the team wanted to be there because of MJ. Every role player wants to go to L.A. because they are huge celeberties there. Here in chicago it isn't really like that. It isn't Hollywood here. Without MJ, which player would have been like "oh man I really want to go play for chicago! the winters are freezing and the summers are so humid!!" hahah.. not a lot of players. Yes the market is big here in chicago, but its bigger in L.A.

If MJ played in L.A. He would have been hyped to the point where he probably didn;t even like himself.

So MJ would have been better in L.A. then Kobe in Chicago.

Soory if i went a little off topic haha

GO BULLS

Michael Jordan on Kobe's Lakers team. MJ is the world's greatest basketball player and if Kobe can lead his laker to 65-17, MJ can lead Kobe's Lakers to 75-7.

MJ on Kobe's team cuz la lakers have Gasol,Odom, Artest, and Fisher. MJ would probably be a better player on the team though cuz he changed b-ball alot and kobe really didnot do anything yet.

Kobe Bryant on Jordan's Bulls team because if Jordan was on Kobe's team there wouldn't be a place for him because they have a loaded team but Kobe on Jordan's team, they'd be great

MJ on Kobe's team.

Jordan can adapt to any-team. He'd probably make there record 76-6. Kobe has to know his supporting team.

There really is nothing to explain.

its tough but i would say mj on kobes tea only beacuse mike could make everyone around him better, not like kobe dosent b ut overall i think mj is more unselfish and would benift more than kobe would

Michael on kobes because Micheal would put them off the chart they would be increadibly stacked.

None. Kobe wouldn't be as good at playing SF or coming off the bench, and MJ wouldn't be as good playing SF or coming off the bench