Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What is the significance of a wedding ring?

16 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Oh wow thats beautiful and could double as a weapon should I ever have to assist you in catching some trolls.

  • Isis
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    That is not an appropriate wedding ring. Cocktail ring maybe. An ever lasting sign of your enduring love. Not a chance.

    By the way I think it's really gaudy and would only disappoint her if you offered it to her as a wedding or engagement ring.

  • 5 years ago

    I wear rings on my middle finger because they pinch the webbing of my skin when I wear them on my ring finger. There's no significance, it's just a comfort thing.

  • 1 decade ago

    Actually there are conflicting ideas as to the origin of the wedding ring. Let us give a few examples: “Originally . . . the ring was a fetter, used to bind the captive bride.” (For Richer, for Poorer) “The ring is a relatively modern substitute for the gold coin or other article of value with which a man literally purchased his wife from her father.” (The Jewish Wedding Book) “The wedding ring is supposed to be of Roman origin, and to have sprung from the ancient custom of using rings in making agreements.” (American Cyclopædia) “Various explanations have been given of the connection of the ring with marriage. It would appear that wedding-rings were worn by the Jews prior to Christian times.”—The International Cyclopaedia.

    It is thus seen that the precise origin of the wedding ring is uncertain. Even if it were a fact that pagans first used wedding rings, would that rule such out for Christians? Not necessarily. Many of today’s articles of clothing and aspects of life originated in pagan lands. The present time divisions of hours, minutes and seconds are based on an early Babylonian system. Yet, there is no objection to a Christian’s using these time divisions, for one’s doing so does not involve carrying on false religious practices.

    Of course, our concern is greater as regards the use of wedding rings, since this relates, not to minor secular matters, but to the marriage relationship, which the Christian rightly views as sacred before God. Really, the question is not so much whether wedding rings were first used by pagans but whether they were originally used as part of false religious practices and still retain such religious significance. As has been shown, the historical evidence does not allow for any definite conclusion on this. What does the Bible say about the use of rings?

    The Bible shows that some of God’s servants in the past wore rings, even ones that had special meaning attached to them. Wearing a signet ring could indicate that one had received authority to act in behalf of the ruler who owned it. (Gen. 41:42; Num. 31:50; Esther 8:2, 8; Job 42:11, 12; Luke 15:22) So, while wedding rings are not mentioned, these true worshipers clearly did not scruple against using rings for more than mere adornment.

    Some persons say that a wedding ring represents one’s unending love and devotion in marriage. The increasing divorce rate in many lands where married persons usually wear a wedding ring proves that this meaning is more imagined than real. Nonetheless, for the majority of persons, including Christians, in lands where wedding rings are common, the ring is an outward indication that the wearer is a married person. In other localities the same point is shown in a different way, such as by a woman’s wearing a certain style of clothing.

    Of course, a wedding ring is by no means a Christian requirement. One Christian might decide not to wear a wedding ring, because of conscience, personal taste, cost, local custom, or some other reason. Yet another Christian might decide to indicate his married status by means of a wedding ring. Hence, in the final analysis the decision is a personal one, to be made in accord with the conscientious views one holds.

    and no its not worthy of a queen it is stupid and ugly

    Source(s): Watchtower magazine
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    the significance of a wedding ring depends upon the person wearing it. for many it is a proud symbol of the eternal union they have promised to another. it can be any type of ring, band, combination, whatever....

    and i think it is beautiful myself. a gift given in love always is. but the one who it is intended for can be the only one who determines if it it is worthy, in the end. i believe she has spoken, though...my blessings upon your troll huntings.

    :)

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    that ring will look good with almost everything ,it is beautiful...

    a wedding ring is for ..eternity..everlasting love...unending love..

    it is an unbroken circle endless and timeless,and is is also harder to break cause it is round... so it is also for strength....

    my ring means this and more to me,and holds something religious in meaning and is a bond...

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Nowadays a Wedding Ring don't mean squat! Marriage only ends with death or divorce & they're both pretty sh***y !

    Source(s): Life !
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Why? too cheap to buy your new Beau (the Queen) a Ring??

  • 1 decade ago

    That's a terrible 'Wedding' ring, but cool as just regular jewelry.

  • tutor
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Stunning!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.