Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Is the government competent enough to devise a new Health care plan?

Has anyone stopped to ask whether or not these people are qualified to be crafting a new health care system? They cannot even be bothered to read the whole bill, and they feel qualified to vote on something so important? After all it is not a health care system that they will be using, they have a special one just for themselves. The President originally didn't even want to allow enough time to read it before demanding a vote. Doesn't that scare anyone?

Update:

"Somebody has to. It can't be done by a bunch of individual people in America. We elected reps to Congress whether you like them or not and they are trying to do something that has needed to be done for many, many years. In one 10 year period, health care costs increased 81% (from 1997 - 2007) My salary sure didn't see an 81% increase."

Is this a Health care issue or a legal reform issue? I would argue that if hospitals and doctors didn't have skyrocketing malpractice costs, then those costs wouldn't be passed on to the public. Talk to any doctor and they will tell you that costs could be cut in half, if you took the malpractice costs out of the equation.

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Pelosi, Reid , Frank , Dodd, Waxman these clowns could not

    find there way out of a easy maze .

    .............................

    ............................ The maze .

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Somebody has to. It can't be done by a bunch of individual people in America. We elected reps to Congress whether you like them or not and they are trying to do something that has needed to be done for many, many years. In one 10 year period, health care costs increased 81% (from 1997 - 2007) My salary sure didn't see an 81% increase.

    Health Care Costs 101

    Katherine B. Wilson

    April 2009

    In 2007, national health care spending reached $2.2 trillion, or $7,421 per person. If left unchecked, it is projected to reach 20.3% of the country's GDP by 2018. Although there has been some moderation in health spending growth in recent years, its share of the economy continues to grow.

    Health Care Costs 101, now published as part of the California HealthCare Foundation's California Health Care Almanac, provides general background on U.S. medical spending. It details how much we spend, on which services, and what proportion is paid directly by consumers.

    Highlights include:

    * Health spending grew 6.1% in 2007, the smallest increase since 1998, extending a five-year decelerating trend. Nevertheless, health spending continues to outpace inflation and is projected to reach $2.5 trillion this year.

    * Projections indicate that the recession will more than offset the recent moderation in health spending. Health care's share of the GDP is expected to rise rapidly, to 17.6% of GDP this year.

    * Nationally, per-person costs for health care increased 81% between 1997 and 2007.

    * While out-of-pocket costs for consumers continue to rise, over the past 40 years they have declined as a share of overall health spending and are now flat at about 14%.

    The 2009 edition of this report is based on 2007 national data, the latest information on health spending available from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Office of the Actuary. Data on health spending for California is released as the data is made available. The most current version is the 2006 edition, below.

    The complete report, as well as quick guides to the national and California data highlights, is available under Document Downloads below. Also available are past editions.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    they are not useful adequate even to run a laundry mat. that's the best rule of economics, governments can't run business enterprise as effectively because of the fact the folk, because of the fact the folk certainly have an incentive to be triumphant. damn Capitalism is astounding.

  • 1 decade ago

    No they are not, the government screws up almost everything they touch.

    They need to stay out of Doctor's office.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Putting the words, "government" and "competent" in the same sentence makes me feel queasy.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I agree that they have proven themselves too irresponsible to pull this off

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.